MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs Unisoc SC7731E
When comparing the specifications of the Unisoc SC7731E and the MediaTek Dimensity 800 processors, it becomes clear that the MediaTek Dimensity 800 offers more advanced features and better performance capabilities.
The Unisoc SC7731E is built on a 28 nm lithography and offers a quad-core architecture consisting of 4x 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 cores. With an instruction set of ARMv7-A, it has a thermal design power (TDP) of 7 Watts. The Unisoc SC7731E lacks any additional features or technologies, making it a basic and entry-level processor.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 is manufactured on a more advanced 7 nm lithography. It boasts a more powerful octa-core architecture, with 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With an instruction set of ARMv8.2-A, it offers improved performance and efficiency. Additionally, the Dimensity 800 includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances AI and machine learning capabilities.
The MediaTek Dimensity 800 clearly outperforms the Unisoc SC7731E in terms of power, speed, and efficiency. The 7 nm lithography ensures better power efficiency, allowing for longer battery life and reduced heat generation. The inclusion of the NPU further improves the processor's ability to handle AI-related tasks.
In terms of computing power, the Dimensity 800's octa-core configuration provides superior multitasking capabilities and overall performance compared to the quad-core setup of the Unisoc SC7731E. The Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores offer better single-core and multi-core performance, enabling smoother multitasking and faster processing speeds.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 processor clearly offers more advanced features and better performance capabilities compared to the Unisoc SC7731E. The 7 nm lithography, octa-core architecture, and inclusion of an NPU make the Dimensity 800 ideal for demanding tasks and high-performance devices. Meanwhile, the Unisoc SC7731E remains a basic and entry-level option.
The Unisoc SC7731E is built on a 28 nm lithography and offers a quad-core architecture consisting of 4x 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 cores. With an instruction set of ARMv7-A, it has a thermal design power (TDP) of 7 Watts. The Unisoc SC7731E lacks any additional features or technologies, making it a basic and entry-level processor.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 is manufactured on a more advanced 7 nm lithography. It boasts a more powerful octa-core architecture, with 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With an instruction set of ARMv8.2-A, it offers improved performance and efficiency. Additionally, the Dimensity 800 includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances AI and machine learning capabilities.
The MediaTek Dimensity 800 clearly outperforms the Unisoc SC7731E in terms of power, speed, and efficiency. The 7 nm lithography ensures better power efficiency, allowing for longer battery life and reduced heat generation. The inclusion of the NPU further improves the processor's ability to handle AI-related tasks.
In terms of computing power, the Dimensity 800's octa-core configuration provides superior multitasking capabilities and overall performance compared to the quad-core setup of the Unisoc SC7731E. The Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores offer better single-core and multi-core performance, enabling smoother multitasking and faster processing speeds.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 processor clearly offers more advanced features and better performance capabilities compared to the Unisoc SC7731E. The 7 nm lithography, octa-core architecture, and inclusion of an NPU make the Dimensity 800 ideal for demanding tasks and high-performance devices. Meanwhile, the Unisoc SC7731E remains a basic and entry-level option.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.3 GHz – Cortex-A7 |
Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv7-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 28 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 7 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 1 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR3 |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 533 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP4 | Mali-T820 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Midgard |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 600 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 1 |
Shaders | 64 | 4 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 1.2 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 1440x720 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 8MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | HD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 4 (802.11n) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 2 | 2018 Quarter 2 |
Partnumber | MT6873, MT6873V | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G vs HiSilicon Kirin 955
2
Samsung Exynos 2500 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
3
MediaTek Helio G70 vs Apple A14 Bionic
4
Samsung Exynos 850 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
5
HiSilicon Kirin 9010 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020
6
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625
7
Unisoc Tiger T606 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
8
MediaTek Helio G100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
9
MediaTek Helio G25 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
10
MediaTek Helio G50 vs Samsung Exynos 9611