MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs Unisoc SC7731E
When comparing the specifications of the Unisoc SC7731E and the MediaTek Dimensity 800 processors, it becomes clear that the MediaTek Dimensity 800 offers more advanced features and better performance capabilities.
The Unisoc SC7731E is built on a 28 nm lithography and offers a quad-core architecture consisting of 4x 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 cores. With an instruction set of ARMv7-A, it has a thermal design power (TDP) of 7 Watts. The Unisoc SC7731E lacks any additional features or technologies, making it a basic and entry-level processor.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 is manufactured on a more advanced 7 nm lithography. It boasts a more powerful octa-core architecture, with 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With an instruction set of ARMv8.2-A, it offers improved performance and efficiency. Additionally, the Dimensity 800 includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances AI and machine learning capabilities.
The MediaTek Dimensity 800 clearly outperforms the Unisoc SC7731E in terms of power, speed, and efficiency. The 7 nm lithography ensures better power efficiency, allowing for longer battery life and reduced heat generation. The inclusion of the NPU further improves the processor's ability to handle AI-related tasks.
In terms of computing power, the Dimensity 800's octa-core configuration provides superior multitasking capabilities and overall performance compared to the quad-core setup of the Unisoc SC7731E. The Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores offer better single-core and multi-core performance, enabling smoother multitasking and faster processing speeds.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 processor clearly offers more advanced features and better performance capabilities compared to the Unisoc SC7731E. The 7 nm lithography, octa-core architecture, and inclusion of an NPU make the Dimensity 800 ideal for demanding tasks and high-performance devices. Meanwhile, the Unisoc SC7731E remains a basic and entry-level option.
The Unisoc SC7731E is built on a 28 nm lithography and offers a quad-core architecture consisting of 4x 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 cores. With an instruction set of ARMv7-A, it has a thermal design power (TDP) of 7 Watts. The Unisoc SC7731E lacks any additional features or technologies, making it a basic and entry-level processor.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 is manufactured on a more advanced 7 nm lithography. It boasts a more powerful octa-core architecture, with 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With an instruction set of ARMv8.2-A, it offers improved performance and efficiency. Additionally, the Dimensity 800 includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances AI and machine learning capabilities.
The MediaTek Dimensity 800 clearly outperforms the Unisoc SC7731E in terms of power, speed, and efficiency. The 7 nm lithography ensures better power efficiency, allowing for longer battery life and reduced heat generation. The inclusion of the NPU further improves the processor's ability to handle AI-related tasks.
In terms of computing power, the Dimensity 800's octa-core configuration provides superior multitasking capabilities and overall performance compared to the quad-core setup of the Unisoc SC7731E. The Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores offer better single-core and multi-core performance, enabling smoother multitasking and faster processing speeds.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 processor clearly offers more advanced features and better performance capabilities compared to the Unisoc SC7731E. The 7 nm lithography, octa-core architecture, and inclusion of an NPU make the Dimensity 800 ideal for demanding tasks and high-performance devices. Meanwhile, the Unisoc SC7731E remains a basic and entry-level option.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.3 GHz – Cortex-A7 |
Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv7-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 28 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 7 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 1 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR3 |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 533 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP4 | Mali-T820 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Midgard |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 600 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 1 |
Shaders | 64 | 4 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 1.2 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 1440x720 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 8MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | HD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 4 (802.11n) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 2 | 2018 Quarter 2 |
Partnumber | MT6873, MT6873V | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
2
Unisoc Tiger T616 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
3
MediaTek Dimensity 1200 vs Unisoc Tiger T710
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
5
Samsung Exynos 2100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs Samsung Exynos 9609
7
HiSilicon Kirin 935 vs Samsung Exynos 9611
8
Samsung Exynos 1280 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
9
Unisoc Tiger T612 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
10
MediaTek Dimensity 720 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1