MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs Unisoc SC7731E
When comparing the specifications of the Unisoc SC7731E and the MediaTek Dimensity 800 processors, it becomes clear that the MediaTek Dimensity 800 offers more advanced features and better performance capabilities.
The Unisoc SC7731E is built on a 28 nm lithography and offers a quad-core architecture consisting of 4x 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 cores. With an instruction set of ARMv7-A, it has a thermal design power (TDP) of 7 Watts. The Unisoc SC7731E lacks any additional features or technologies, making it a basic and entry-level processor.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 is manufactured on a more advanced 7 nm lithography. It boasts a more powerful octa-core architecture, with 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With an instruction set of ARMv8.2-A, it offers improved performance and efficiency. Additionally, the Dimensity 800 includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances AI and machine learning capabilities.
The MediaTek Dimensity 800 clearly outperforms the Unisoc SC7731E in terms of power, speed, and efficiency. The 7 nm lithography ensures better power efficiency, allowing for longer battery life and reduced heat generation. The inclusion of the NPU further improves the processor's ability to handle AI-related tasks.
In terms of computing power, the Dimensity 800's octa-core configuration provides superior multitasking capabilities and overall performance compared to the quad-core setup of the Unisoc SC7731E. The Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores offer better single-core and multi-core performance, enabling smoother multitasking and faster processing speeds.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 processor clearly offers more advanced features and better performance capabilities compared to the Unisoc SC7731E. The 7 nm lithography, octa-core architecture, and inclusion of an NPU make the Dimensity 800 ideal for demanding tasks and high-performance devices. Meanwhile, the Unisoc SC7731E remains a basic and entry-level option.
The Unisoc SC7731E is built on a 28 nm lithography and offers a quad-core architecture consisting of 4x 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 cores. With an instruction set of ARMv7-A, it has a thermal design power (TDP) of 7 Watts. The Unisoc SC7731E lacks any additional features or technologies, making it a basic and entry-level processor.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 is manufactured on a more advanced 7 nm lithography. It boasts a more powerful octa-core architecture, with 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With an instruction set of ARMv8.2-A, it offers improved performance and efficiency. Additionally, the Dimensity 800 includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances AI and machine learning capabilities.
The MediaTek Dimensity 800 clearly outperforms the Unisoc SC7731E in terms of power, speed, and efficiency. The 7 nm lithography ensures better power efficiency, allowing for longer battery life and reduced heat generation. The inclusion of the NPU further improves the processor's ability to handle AI-related tasks.
In terms of computing power, the Dimensity 800's octa-core configuration provides superior multitasking capabilities and overall performance compared to the quad-core setup of the Unisoc SC7731E. The Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores offer better single-core and multi-core performance, enabling smoother multitasking and faster processing speeds.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 processor clearly offers more advanced features and better performance capabilities compared to the Unisoc SC7731E. The 7 nm lithography, octa-core architecture, and inclusion of an NPU make the Dimensity 800 ideal for demanding tasks and high-performance devices. Meanwhile, the Unisoc SC7731E remains a basic and entry-level option.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.3 GHz – Cortex-A7 |
Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv7-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 28 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 7 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 1 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR3 |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 533 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP4 | Mali-T820 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Midgard |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 600 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 1 |
Shaders | 64 | 4 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 1.2 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 1440x720 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 8MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | HD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 4 (802.11n) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 2 | 2018 Quarter 2 |
Partnumber | MT6873, MT6873V | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio G25 vs Samsung Exynos 990
2
MediaTek Helio G70 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
3
HiSilicon Kirin 935 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
5
MediaTek Dimensity 1200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
6
HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G
7
MediaTek Helio G35 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000
8
Samsung Exynos 7880 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
9
Unisoc Tiger T618 vs Samsung Exynos 9609
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 vs MediaTek Dimensity 900