HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G
The HiSilicon Kirin 955 and the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G are two processors that have different specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 955, it features an architecture consisting of 4x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This combination of high-performance and power-efficient cores enables the processor to handle a variety of tasks effectively. The processor is built on a 16 nm lithography process, which helps in delivering improved power efficiency and performance. With 2000 million transistors, the Kirin 955 is designed to provide ample processing power. Additionally, it has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watts, which means it consumes less power and produces less heat.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G features an architecture with 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This configuration delivers a balance between performance and power efficiency. The processor uses a 12 nm lithography process, which further enhances its power efficiency. One notable feature of the Tanggula T740 5G is its dual NPU (Neural Processing Unit). This means that the processor can perform AI tasks more efficiently, leading to improved AI capabilities on devices powered by the Tanggula T740 5G.
In summary, while both processors have 8 cores and support the ARMv8 instruction set, there are notable differences. The HiSilicon Kirin 955 has a higher maximum clock speed, but the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G has a more advanced lithography process and features a dual NPU for enhanced AI performance. The choice between the two processors would depend on the specific requirements of the device and the tasks it needs to perform.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 955, it features an architecture consisting of 4x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This combination of high-performance and power-efficient cores enables the processor to handle a variety of tasks effectively. The processor is built on a 16 nm lithography process, which helps in delivering improved power efficiency and performance. With 2000 million transistors, the Kirin 955 is designed to provide ample processing power. Additionally, it has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watts, which means it consumes less power and produces less heat.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G features an architecture with 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This configuration delivers a balance between performance and power efficiency. The processor uses a 12 nm lithography process, which further enhances its power efficiency. One notable feature of the Tanggula T740 5G is its dual NPU (Neural Processing Unit). This means that the processor can perform AI tasks more efficiently, leading to improved AI capabilities on devices powered by the Tanggula T740 5G.
In summary, while both processors have 8 cores and support the ARMv8 instruction set, there are notable differences. The HiSilicon Kirin 955 has a higher maximum clock speed, but the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G has a more advanced lithography process and features a dual NPU for enhanced AI performance. The choice between the two processors would depend on the specific requirements of the device and the tasks it needs to perform.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A72 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Number of transistors | 2000 million | |
| TDP | 5 Watt | |
| Neural Processing | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1333 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x32 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-T880 MP4 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Midgard | PowerVR Rogue |
| GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Execution units | 4 | |
| Shaders | 64 | |
| DirectX | 11.2 | |
| OpenCL API | 1.2 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2960x1440@60Hz | |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 31MP, 2x 13MP | 1x 64MP |
| Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | 4K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 0.75 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2016 April | 2020 Quarter 1 |
| Partnumber | Hi3655 | T740, Tiger T7510 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 vs MediaTek Helio G37
4
Apple M2 (iPad) vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
5
Samsung Exynos 850 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
6
Samsung Exynos 7870 vs Google Tensor G4
7
Unisoc T9100 vs Unisoc SC7731E
8
MediaTek Dimensity 8050 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro
9
HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs MediaTek Helio G35
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (Gen 4) vs Samsung Exynos 9611