HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G
The HiSilicon Kirin 955 and the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G are two processors that have different specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 955, it features an architecture consisting of 4x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This combination of high-performance and power-efficient cores enables the processor to handle a variety of tasks effectively. The processor is built on a 16 nm lithography process, which helps in delivering improved power efficiency and performance. With 2000 million transistors, the Kirin 955 is designed to provide ample processing power. Additionally, it has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watts, which means it consumes less power and produces less heat.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G features an architecture with 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This configuration delivers a balance between performance and power efficiency. The processor uses a 12 nm lithography process, which further enhances its power efficiency. One notable feature of the Tanggula T740 5G is its dual NPU (Neural Processing Unit). This means that the processor can perform AI tasks more efficiently, leading to improved AI capabilities on devices powered by the Tanggula T740 5G.
In summary, while both processors have 8 cores and support the ARMv8 instruction set, there are notable differences. The HiSilicon Kirin 955 has a higher maximum clock speed, but the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G has a more advanced lithography process and features a dual NPU for enhanced AI performance. The choice between the two processors would depend on the specific requirements of the device and the tasks it needs to perform.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 955, it features an architecture consisting of 4x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This combination of high-performance and power-efficient cores enables the processor to handle a variety of tasks effectively. The processor is built on a 16 nm lithography process, which helps in delivering improved power efficiency and performance. With 2000 million transistors, the Kirin 955 is designed to provide ample processing power. Additionally, it has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watts, which means it consumes less power and produces less heat.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G features an architecture with 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This configuration delivers a balance between performance and power efficiency. The processor uses a 12 nm lithography process, which further enhances its power efficiency. One notable feature of the Tanggula T740 5G is its dual NPU (Neural Processing Unit). This means that the processor can perform AI tasks more efficiently, leading to improved AI capabilities on devices powered by the Tanggula T740 5G.
In summary, while both processors have 8 cores and support the ARMv8 instruction set, there are notable differences. The HiSilicon Kirin 955 has a higher maximum clock speed, but the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G has a more advanced lithography process and features a dual NPU for enhanced AI performance. The choice between the two processors would depend on the specific requirements of the device and the tasks it needs to perform.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A72 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 16 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 2000 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | |
Neural Processing | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1333 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T880 MP4 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
GPU Architecture | Mali Midgard | PowerVR Rogue |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 800 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | |
Shaders | 64 | |
DirectX | 11.2 | |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 4.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2960x1440@60Hz | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 31MP, 2x 13MP | 1x 64MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 0.75 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2016 April | 2020 Quarter 1 |
Partnumber | Hi3655 | T740, Tiger T7510 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio P70 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
2
MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
3
Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
4
Apple A9 vs MediaTek Helio G100
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 vs Unisoc T8300
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs MediaTek Helio A22
7
Samsung Exynos 9810 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
8
Apple A17 Pro vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
10
MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus vs Unisoc SC7731E