MediaTek Dimensity 720 vs Unisoc Tiger T610
The Unisoc Tiger T610 and MediaTek Dimensity 720 are two processors with distinct specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T610, it features an architecture consisting of two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores also clocked at 1.8 GHz. With a total of eight cores, this processor operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. It has a lithography of 12 nm and a power consumption of 10 Watts.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 boasts an architecture consisting of two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2 GHz. Like the T610, it also has eight cores and uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the Dimensity 720 has a more advanced lithography of 7 nm, allowing for increased power efficiency. It also has a power consumption of 10 Watts. Additionally, the Dimensity 720 comes equipped with a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its capabilities for tasks related to machine learning and artificial intelligence.
Both processors offer similar core and instruction set configurations, with the Cortex-A55 cores handling less demanding tasks, while the more powerful Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A76 cores tackle more intensive processing. However, the Dimensity 720's advantage lies in its more advanced lithography of 7 nm, providing better power efficiency compared to the T610's 12 nm lithography. The inclusion of an NPU in the Dimensity 720 also sets it apart, allowing for improved performance in AI-related tasks.
In summary, while both processors share some similarities in terms of their cores and instruction sets, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 stands out with its superior lithography and the addition of an NPU, enhancing its overall capabilities and efficiency.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T610, it features an architecture consisting of two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores also clocked at 1.8 GHz. With a total of eight cores, this processor operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. It has a lithography of 12 nm and a power consumption of 10 Watts.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 boasts an architecture consisting of two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2 GHz. Like the T610, it also has eight cores and uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the Dimensity 720 has a more advanced lithography of 7 nm, allowing for increased power efficiency. It also has a power consumption of 10 Watts. Additionally, the Dimensity 720 comes equipped with a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its capabilities for tasks related to machine learning and artificial intelligence.
Both processors offer similar core and instruction set configurations, with the Cortex-A55 cores handling less demanding tasks, while the more powerful Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A76 cores tackle more intensive processing. However, the Dimensity 720's advantage lies in its more advanced lithography of 7 nm, providing better power efficiency compared to the T610's 12 nm lithography. The inclusion of an NPU in the Dimensity 720 also sets it apart, allowing for improved performance in AI-related tasks.
In summary, while both processors share some similarities in terms of their cores and instruction sets, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 stands out with its superior lithography and the addition of an NPU, enhancing its overall capabilities and efficiency.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP3 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 614.4 MHz |
Execution units | 3 | 2 |
Shaders | 32 | |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@90Hz | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 1x 20MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 32MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 3 | 2019 June |
Partnumber | MT6853V/ZA, MT6853V/NZA | T610 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs Apple A11 Bionic
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs Samsung Exynos 9810
5
Apple A16 Bionic vs MediaTek Helio G25
6
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
7
HiSilicon Kirin 935 vs Samsung Exynos 1280
8
MediaTek Helio G88 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
9
Samsung Exynos 9820 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
10
MediaTek Helio G36 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821