HiSilicon Kirin 980 vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
The HiSilicon Kirin 980 and the MediaTek Dimensity 930 are both powerful processors used in various mobile devices. Let's compare their key specifications to see how they differ.
When it comes to CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 boasts an architecture of 2x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76, 2x 1.92 GHz Cortex-A76, and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 features an architecture of 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. It is worth noting that the Cortex-A78 cores in the Dimensity 930 are slightly lower clocked compared to the Kirin 980's Cortex-A76 cores.
Both processors have 8 cores, but they differ in their instruction sets. The HiSilicon Kirin 980 supports ARMv8-A, while the MediaTek Dimensity 930 supports ARMv8.2-A. This means that the Dimensity 930 has newer instruction sets, potentially offering improved performance and efficiency in certain tasks.
In terms of lithography, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 is manufactured using a 7 nm process, while the MediaTek Dimensity 930 utilizes a 6 nm process. The smaller lithography typically results in better power efficiency and overall performance.
The HiSilicon Kirin 980 has approximately 6900 million transistors, while the exact number for the MediaTek Dimensity 930 is not specified. More transistors generally indicate a more advanced and powerful processor.
As for their thermal design power (TDP), the HiSilicon Kirin 980 has a TDP of 6 Watts, while the MediaTek Dimensity 930 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts. Lower TDP values are generally desirable as they contribute to better energy efficiency and reduced heat generation.
Both processors feature neural processing units (NPUs) for AI-related tasks. The HiSilicon Kirin 980 has a Dual NPU, whereas the MediaTek Dimensity 930 comes with a single NPU. The inclusion of NPUs enhances the processors' ability to handle neural networks and AI algorithms efficiently.
In summary, while both the HiSilicon Kirin 980 and the MediaTek Dimensity 930 are capable processors, they differ in key areas such as CPU architecture, instruction sets, lithography, TDP, and the number of NPUs. These differences might result in varying levels of performance, power efficiency, and AI capabilities based on the specific needs and applications of a device.
When it comes to CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 boasts an architecture of 2x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76, 2x 1.92 GHz Cortex-A76, and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 features an architecture of 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. It is worth noting that the Cortex-A78 cores in the Dimensity 930 are slightly lower clocked compared to the Kirin 980's Cortex-A76 cores.
Both processors have 8 cores, but they differ in their instruction sets. The HiSilicon Kirin 980 supports ARMv8-A, while the MediaTek Dimensity 930 supports ARMv8.2-A. This means that the Dimensity 930 has newer instruction sets, potentially offering improved performance and efficiency in certain tasks.
In terms of lithography, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 is manufactured using a 7 nm process, while the MediaTek Dimensity 930 utilizes a 6 nm process. The smaller lithography typically results in better power efficiency and overall performance.
The HiSilicon Kirin 980 has approximately 6900 million transistors, while the exact number for the MediaTek Dimensity 930 is not specified. More transistors generally indicate a more advanced and powerful processor.
As for their thermal design power (TDP), the HiSilicon Kirin 980 has a TDP of 6 Watts, while the MediaTek Dimensity 930 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts. Lower TDP values are generally desirable as they contribute to better energy efficiency and reduced heat generation.
Both processors feature neural processing units (NPUs) for AI-related tasks. The HiSilicon Kirin 980 has a Dual NPU, whereas the MediaTek Dimensity 930 comes with a single NPU. The inclusion of NPUs enhances the processors' ability to handle neural networks and AI algorithms efficiently.
In summary, while both the HiSilicon Kirin 980 and the MediaTek Dimensity 930 are capable processors, they differ in key areas such as CPU architecture, instruction sets, lithography, TDP, and the number of NPUs. These differences might result in varying levels of performance, power efficiency, and AI capabilities based on the specific needs and applications of a device.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 2x 1.92 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 6 nm |
Number of transistors | 6900 million | |
TDP | 6 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | HiSilicon Dual NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G76 MP10 | Imagination PowerVR BXM-8-256 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 720 MHz | 800 MHz |
Execution units | 10 | |
Shaders | 160 | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 3.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | 2520x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 32MP | 1x 108MP, 1x 64MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 2K@30fps |
Video codec support | AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 1.4 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2018 Quarter 4 | 2022 Quarter 3 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 800U vs Unisoc SC9832E
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 vs Unisoc Tiger T618
4
MediaTek Helio G70 vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Samsung Exynos 7420
6
Google Tensor G2 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
7
HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
8
MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs MediaTek Helio G90T
9
MediaTek Helio P90 vs Samsung Exynos 1280
10
Google Tensor G1 vs MediaTek Helio P65