HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G with Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 2x 2.86 GHz – Cortex-A76 2x 2.09 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.86 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78 (Kryo 670 Prime) 3x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A78 (Kryo 670 Gold) 4x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A55 (Kryo 670 Silver) |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| Number of transistors | 8000 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 5 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture, HiAI 2.0 | Qualcomm Hexagon 770 |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 16 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G76 MP16 | Adreno 642L |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | Qualcomm Adreno 600 |
| GPU frequency | 600 MHz | |
| Execution units | 16 | 4 |
| Shaders | 256 | 384 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3360x1440@60Hz | 2520x1080@144Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 200MP, 1x 36MP + 1x 22MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VC-1 VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 3.7 Gbps | |
| Peak Upload Speed | 1.6 Gbps | |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2019 Quarter 4 | 2021 Quarter 2 |
| Partnumber | SM7325 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 vs Apple A9
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 vs Unisoc Tiger T310
4
Samsung Exynos 7870 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus
5
HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3 vs Unisoc Tiger T618
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 vs MediaTek Helio G99
8
Samsung Exynos 1580 vs Apple A12 Bionic
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020