MediaTek Dimensity 720 vs Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G
The Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G and MediaTek Dimensity 720 are two processors that can be compared based on their specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G, it features a CPU architecture composed of 4 Cortex-A76 cores running at 2.2 GHz and 4 Cortex-A55 cores running at 1.8 GHz. This processor has a total of 8 cores and a 6nm lithography. Its TDP (Thermal Design Power) is relatively low at 5 Watts, making it more power-efficient. Additionally, it includes Neural Processing capabilities through its NPU (Neural Processing Unit).
On the other hand, we have the MediaTek Dimensity 720, which features an architecture composed of 2 Cortex-A76 cores running at 2.2 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores running at 2 GHz. Like the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G, it has a total of 8 cores, but it differs in terms of lithography, with a slightly higher 7nm lithography. The TDP is higher in this processor, at 10 Watts. Similar to the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G, it also includes a Neural Processing Unit for AI capabilities.
In terms of architecture, both processors utilize the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, indicating similar compatibility and support for various software and applications.
These specifications showcase some differences between the two processors. The Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G appears to have higher clock speeds for its processing cores, offering potentially better performance in tasks that require higher single-core performance. In contrast, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 has a higher TDP, suggesting that it may consume more power but could potentially offer better multi-core performance due to its higher core count.
Overall, when considering these specifications, it is important to analyze the specific needs and requirements of the application or device in question in order to determine which processor would be the most suitable choice.
Starting with the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G, it features a CPU architecture composed of 4 Cortex-A76 cores running at 2.2 GHz and 4 Cortex-A55 cores running at 1.8 GHz. This processor has a total of 8 cores and a 6nm lithography. Its TDP (Thermal Design Power) is relatively low at 5 Watts, making it more power-efficient. Additionally, it includes Neural Processing capabilities through its NPU (Neural Processing Unit).
On the other hand, we have the MediaTek Dimensity 720, which features an architecture composed of 2 Cortex-A76 cores running at 2.2 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores running at 2 GHz. Like the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G, it has a total of 8 cores, but it differs in terms of lithography, with a slightly higher 7nm lithography. The TDP is higher in this processor, at 10 Watts. Similar to the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G, it also includes a Neural Processing Unit for AI capabilities.
In terms of architecture, both processors utilize the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, indicating similar compatibility and support for various software and applications.
These specifications showcase some differences between the two processors. The Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G appears to have higher clock speeds for its processing cores, offering potentially better performance in tasks that require higher single-core performance. In contrast, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 has a higher TDP, suggesting that it may consume more power but could potentially offer better multi-core performance due to its higher core count.
Overall, when considering these specifications, it is important to analyze the specific needs and requirements of the application or device in question in order to determine which processor would be the most suitable choice.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| TDP | 10 Watt | 5 Watt |
| Neural Processing | NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 16 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G57 MP3 | Mali-G57 MP6 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Execution units | 3 | 6 |
| Shaders | 96 | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@90Hz | 2160x1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 1x 20MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | FullHD@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 2.7 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 3 | 2021 February |
| Partnumber | MT6853V/ZA, MT6853V/NZA | T760 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 7884B vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
2
Apple A11 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690
3
MediaTek Helio G90T vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
4
Samsung Exynos 1330 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 vs Samsung Exynos 1580
7
Apple A12 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4s Gen 2
8
Samsung Exynos 7885 vs HiSilicon Kirin 659
9
MediaTek Dimensity 1080 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
10
Apple A18 vs Samsung Exynos 850