MediaTek Dimensity 720 vs Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G
The Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G and MediaTek Dimensity 720 are two processors that can be compared based on their specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G, it features a CPU architecture composed of 4 Cortex-A76 cores running at 2.2 GHz and 4 Cortex-A55 cores running at 1.8 GHz. This processor has a total of 8 cores and a 6nm lithography. Its TDP (Thermal Design Power) is relatively low at 5 Watts, making it more power-efficient. Additionally, it includes Neural Processing capabilities through its NPU (Neural Processing Unit).
On the other hand, we have the MediaTek Dimensity 720, which features an architecture composed of 2 Cortex-A76 cores running at 2.2 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores running at 2 GHz. Like the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G, it has a total of 8 cores, but it differs in terms of lithography, with a slightly higher 7nm lithography. The TDP is higher in this processor, at 10 Watts. Similar to the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G, it also includes a Neural Processing Unit for AI capabilities.
In terms of architecture, both processors utilize the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, indicating similar compatibility and support for various software and applications.
These specifications showcase some differences between the two processors. The Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G appears to have higher clock speeds for its processing cores, offering potentially better performance in tasks that require higher single-core performance. In contrast, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 has a higher TDP, suggesting that it may consume more power but could potentially offer better multi-core performance due to its higher core count.
Overall, when considering these specifications, it is important to analyze the specific needs and requirements of the application or device in question in order to determine which processor would be the most suitable choice.
Starting with the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G, it features a CPU architecture composed of 4 Cortex-A76 cores running at 2.2 GHz and 4 Cortex-A55 cores running at 1.8 GHz. This processor has a total of 8 cores and a 6nm lithography. Its TDP (Thermal Design Power) is relatively low at 5 Watts, making it more power-efficient. Additionally, it includes Neural Processing capabilities through its NPU (Neural Processing Unit).
On the other hand, we have the MediaTek Dimensity 720, which features an architecture composed of 2 Cortex-A76 cores running at 2.2 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores running at 2 GHz. Like the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G, it has a total of 8 cores, but it differs in terms of lithography, with a slightly higher 7nm lithography. The TDP is higher in this processor, at 10 Watts. Similar to the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G, it also includes a Neural Processing Unit for AI capabilities.
In terms of architecture, both processors utilize the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, indicating similar compatibility and support for various software and applications.
These specifications showcase some differences between the two processors. The Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G appears to have higher clock speeds for its processing cores, offering potentially better performance in tasks that require higher single-core performance. In contrast, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 has a higher TDP, suggesting that it may consume more power but could potentially offer better multi-core performance due to its higher core count.
Overall, when considering these specifications, it is important to analyze the specific needs and requirements of the application or device in question in order to determine which processor would be the most suitable choice.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 6 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 5 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP3 | Mali-G57 MP6 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 3 | 6 |
Shaders | 96 | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@90Hz | 2160x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 1x 20MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 2.7 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 3 | 2021 February |
Partnumber | MT6853V/ZA, MT6853V/NZA | T760 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
2
Apple A11 Bionic vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
3
MediaTek Helio G96 vs Google Tensor G3
4
HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs MediaTek Helio G85
5
Samsung Exynos 8895 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 vs Unisoc Tiger T310
7
MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
9
MediaTek Dimensity 1200 vs Unisoc Tiger T606
10
Unisoc Tiger T616 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G