MediaTek Dimensity 720 vs Unisoc SC7731E
The Unisoc SC7731E and the MediaTek Dimensity 720 are both processors used in mobile devices, but they have some notable differences in their specifications.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc SC7731E has 4 Cortex-A7 cores clocked at 1.3 GHz. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 has a more powerful configuration with 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2 GHz. This indicates that the Dimensity 720 has a more advanced and faster CPU architecture compared to the SC7731E.
Regarding the number of cores, the SC7731E has 4 cores, while the Dimensity 720 boasts 8 cores. Having more cores allows for better multitasking and improved performance when running multiple applications simultaneously.
In terms of instruction set, the Unisoc processor follows the ARMv7-A instruction set, while the MediaTek processor uses the more advanced ARMv8.2-A instruction set. This means that the Dimensity 720 is better optimized for newer software and can potentially provide better performance.
When it comes to lithography, the SC7731E has a 28 nm lithography, while the Dimensity 720 utilizes a more advanced 7 nm lithography. A smaller lithography generally translates to more power efficiency and improved performance.
In terms of TDP (Thermal Design Power), the SC7731E has a TDP of 7 Watts, while the Dimensity 720 has a TDP of 10 Watts. A higher TDP generally indicates that the processor generates more heat and may require better cooling solutions.
Finally, the Dimensity 720 has an additional feature called Neural Processing Unit (NPU) that enables AI and machine learning capabilities. This can provide better AI performance and support for advanced AI applications.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 surpasses the Unisoc SC7731E in terms of CPU architecture, the number of cores, instruction set, lithography, and the inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit. These specifications suggest that the Dimensity 720 is likely to offer superior performance and efficiency compared to the SC7731E.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc SC7731E has 4 Cortex-A7 cores clocked at 1.3 GHz. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 has a more powerful configuration with 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2 GHz. This indicates that the Dimensity 720 has a more advanced and faster CPU architecture compared to the SC7731E.
Regarding the number of cores, the SC7731E has 4 cores, while the Dimensity 720 boasts 8 cores. Having more cores allows for better multitasking and improved performance when running multiple applications simultaneously.
In terms of instruction set, the Unisoc processor follows the ARMv7-A instruction set, while the MediaTek processor uses the more advanced ARMv8.2-A instruction set. This means that the Dimensity 720 is better optimized for newer software and can potentially provide better performance.
When it comes to lithography, the SC7731E has a 28 nm lithography, while the Dimensity 720 utilizes a more advanced 7 nm lithography. A smaller lithography generally translates to more power efficiency and improved performance.
In terms of TDP (Thermal Design Power), the SC7731E has a TDP of 7 Watts, while the Dimensity 720 has a TDP of 10 Watts. A higher TDP generally indicates that the processor generates more heat and may require better cooling solutions.
Finally, the Dimensity 720 has an additional feature called Neural Processing Unit (NPU) that enables AI and machine learning capabilities. This can provide better AI performance and support for advanced AI applications.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 surpasses the Unisoc SC7731E in terms of CPU architecture, the number of cores, instruction set, lithography, and the inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit. These specifications suggest that the Dimensity 720 is likely to offer superior performance and efficiency compared to the SC7731E.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.3 GHz – Cortex-A7 |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv7-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 28 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 7 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 1 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR3 |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 533 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP3 | Mali-T820 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Midgard |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 600 MHz |
Execution units | 3 | 1 |
Shaders | 4 | |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 1.2 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@90Hz | 1440x720 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 1x 20MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 8MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | HD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 4 (802.11n) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 3 | 2018 Quarter 2 |
Partnumber | MT6853V/ZA, MT6853V/NZA | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
2
HiSilicon Kirin 659 vs MediaTek Helio A25
3
Xiaomi Xring O1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7350
4
Samsung Exynos 8895 vs Unisoc T820
5
MediaTek Helio G88 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 vs Unisoc Tiger T610
7
Apple A19 Pro vs MediaTek Helio P95
8
HiSilicon Kirin 935 vs MediaTek MT6739
9
Unisoc Tiger T606 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9020
10
Unisoc Tiger T310 vs MediaTek Helio G81