MediaTek Dimensity 720 vs Unisoc SC7731E
The Unisoc SC7731E and the MediaTek Dimensity 720 are both processors used in mobile devices, but they have some notable differences in their specifications.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc SC7731E has 4 Cortex-A7 cores clocked at 1.3 GHz. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 has a more powerful configuration with 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2 GHz. This indicates that the Dimensity 720 has a more advanced and faster CPU architecture compared to the SC7731E.
Regarding the number of cores, the SC7731E has 4 cores, while the Dimensity 720 boasts 8 cores. Having more cores allows for better multitasking and improved performance when running multiple applications simultaneously.
In terms of instruction set, the Unisoc processor follows the ARMv7-A instruction set, while the MediaTek processor uses the more advanced ARMv8.2-A instruction set. This means that the Dimensity 720 is better optimized for newer software and can potentially provide better performance.
When it comes to lithography, the SC7731E has a 28 nm lithography, while the Dimensity 720 utilizes a more advanced 7 nm lithography. A smaller lithography generally translates to more power efficiency and improved performance.
In terms of TDP (Thermal Design Power), the SC7731E has a TDP of 7 Watts, while the Dimensity 720 has a TDP of 10 Watts. A higher TDP generally indicates that the processor generates more heat and may require better cooling solutions.
Finally, the Dimensity 720 has an additional feature called Neural Processing Unit (NPU) that enables AI and machine learning capabilities. This can provide better AI performance and support for advanced AI applications.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 surpasses the Unisoc SC7731E in terms of CPU architecture, the number of cores, instruction set, lithography, and the inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit. These specifications suggest that the Dimensity 720 is likely to offer superior performance and efficiency compared to the SC7731E.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc SC7731E has 4 Cortex-A7 cores clocked at 1.3 GHz. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 has a more powerful configuration with 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2 GHz. This indicates that the Dimensity 720 has a more advanced and faster CPU architecture compared to the SC7731E.
Regarding the number of cores, the SC7731E has 4 cores, while the Dimensity 720 boasts 8 cores. Having more cores allows for better multitasking and improved performance when running multiple applications simultaneously.
In terms of instruction set, the Unisoc processor follows the ARMv7-A instruction set, while the MediaTek processor uses the more advanced ARMv8.2-A instruction set. This means that the Dimensity 720 is better optimized for newer software and can potentially provide better performance.
When it comes to lithography, the SC7731E has a 28 nm lithography, while the Dimensity 720 utilizes a more advanced 7 nm lithography. A smaller lithography generally translates to more power efficiency and improved performance.
In terms of TDP (Thermal Design Power), the SC7731E has a TDP of 7 Watts, while the Dimensity 720 has a TDP of 10 Watts. A higher TDP generally indicates that the processor generates more heat and may require better cooling solutions.
Finally, the Dimensity 720 has an additional feature called Neural Processing Unit (NPU) that enables AI and machine learning capabilities. This can provide better AI performance and support for advanced AI applications.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 surpasses the Unisoc SC7731E in terms of CPU architecture, the number of cores, instruction set, lithography, and the inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit. These specifications suggest that the Dimensity 720 is likely to offer superior performance and efficiency compared to the SC7731E.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.3 GHz – Cortex-A7 |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv7-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 28 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 7 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 1 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR3 |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 533 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP3 | Mali-T820 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Midgard |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 600 MHz |
Execution units | 3 | 1 |
Shaders | 4 | |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 1.2 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@90Hz | 1440x720 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 1x 20MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 8MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | HD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 4 (802.11n) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 3 | 2018 Quarter 2 |
Partnumber | MT6853V/ZA, MT6853V/NZA | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 9820 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
2
Unisoc Tiger T610 vs MediaTek Helio A25
3
Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820
4
Apple A10X Fusion vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
5
Apple A12 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 vs MediaTek Helio P90
8
MediaTek Dimensity 1100 vs MediaTek Helio P35
9
MediaTek Helio G90T vs MediaTek Helio G96
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 vs Samsung Exynos 1280