MediaTek Dimensity 7050 vs Samsung Exynos 2600

VS

Which processor is better? We compared MediaTek Dimensity 7050 with Samsung Exynos 2600. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?

AnTuTu 10

Total Score

Dimensity 7050

552853

Exynos 2600

GeekBench 6 Single-Core

Score

Dimensity 7050

843

Exynos 2600

3455

GeekBench 6 Multi-Core

Score

Dimensity 7050

2294

Exynos 2600

11621

CPU cores and architecture

Architecture	2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55	1x 3.8 GHz – C1-Ultra 3x 3.25 GHz – C1-Pro 6x 2.75 GHz – C1-Pro
Number of cores	8	10
Instruction Set	ARMv8.2-A	ARMv9.3-A
Lithography	6 nm	2 nm
TDP	4 Watt
Neural Processing	MediaTek APU 3.0	AI engine with 32K MAC NPU

Memory (RAM)

Max amount	up to 16 GB	up to 24 GB
Memory type	LPDDR5	LPDDR5X
Memory frequency	3200 MHz
Memory-bus	4x16 bit	4x16 bit

Storage

Storage specification

UFS 3.1

Graphics

GPU name	Mali-G68 MP4	Xclipse 960
GPU Architecture	Mali Valhall	RDNA
GPU frequency	800 MHz	985 MHz
Execution units	3
Shaders	64
DirectX		12.1
OpenCL API	2.1	2.0
OpenGL API	ES 3.2
Vulkan API	1.2	1.4

Camera, Video, Display

Max screen resolution	2520x1080	3840x2160
Max camera resolution	1x 200MP	1x 320MP
Max Video Capture	4K@30fps	8K@30fps
Video codec support	H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9	AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9

Wireless

4G network	Yes	Yes
5G network	Yes	Yes
Peak Download Speed	2.77 Gbps	14.79 Gbps
Wi-Fi	6 (802.11ax)	7 (802.11be)
Bluetooth	5.2	6.0
Satellite navigation	BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS	BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS