MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs Unisoc Tiger T710
The Unisoc Tiger T710 and the MediaTek Dimensity 700 are two processors with distinct specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T710, it features an architecture with 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This octa-core processor operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. Additionally, it is equipped with Dual Neural Processing Units (NPUs) for enhanced AI capabilities.
In comparison, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 features an architecture with 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Tiger T710, this processor operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, but it has a more advanced lithography of 7 nm. Additionally, it has a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 10 Watts.
Both processors have eight cores, but they differ in terms of the CPU cores and architecture. The Tiger T710 has a higher number of Cortex-A75 cores, which are typically more powerful, while the Dimensity 700 has a greater number of Cortex-A55 cores for efficient processing.
Furthermore, the Dimensity 700 has a more advanced lithography of 7 nm, indicating a more modern manufacturing process compared to the Tiger T710's 12 nm lithography. This generally translates to improved power efficiency and performance.
One notable difference is that the Tiger T710 has Dual NPUs, a feature not mentioned for the Dimensity 700. This suggests that the Tiger T710 may have better AI processing capabilities or enhanced neural network performance.
In summary, while both the Unisoc Tiger T710 and MediaTek Dimensity 700 are octa-core processors with ARMv8.2-A instruction sets, they differ in terms of CPU cores and architecture, lithography, and additional features. The Tiger T710 has more Cortex-A75 cores, a 12 nm lithography, and Dual NPUs, while the Dimensity 700 has more Cortex-A55 cores, a 7 nm lithography, and a TDP of 10 Watts. The choice between the two processors would depend on specific usage requirements and priorities, such as power efficiency or AI processing capabilities.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T710, it features an architecture with 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This octa-core processor operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. Additionally, it is equipped with Dual Neural Processing Units (NPUs) for enhanced AI capabilities.
In comparison, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 features an architecture with 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Tiger T710, this processor operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, but it has a more advanced lithography of 7 nm. Additionally, it has a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 10 Watts.
Both processors have eight cores, but they differ in terms of the CPU cores and architecture. The Tiger T710 has a higher number of Cortex-A75 cores, which are typically more powerful, while the Dimensity 700 has a greater number of Cortex-A55 cores for efficient processing.
Furthermore, the Dimensity 700 has a more advanced lithography of 7 nm, indicating a more modern manufacturing process compared to the Tiger T710's 12 nm lithography. This generally translates to improved power efficiency and performance.
One notable difference is that the Tiger T710 has Dual NPUs, a feature not mentioned for the Dimensity 700. This suggests that the Tiger T710 may have better AI processing capabilities or enhanced neural network performance.
In summary, while both the Unisoc Tiger T710 and MediaTek Dimensity 700 are octa-core processors with ARMv8.2-A instruction sets, they differ in terms of CPU cores and architecture, lithography, and additional features. The Tiger T710 has more Cortex-A75 cores, a 12 nm lithography, and Dual NPUs, while the Dimensity 700 has more Cortex-A55 cores, a 7 nm lithography, and a TDP of 10 Watts. The choice between the two processors would depend on specific usage requirements and priorities, such as power efficiency or AI processing capabilities.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | |
Neural Processing | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP2 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 800 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | |
Shaders | 32 | |
DirectX | 12 | |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@90Hz | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 24MP |
Max Video Capture | 2K@30FPS | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 1 | 2019 |
Partnumber | MT6833V/ZA, MT6833V/NZA | T710 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio P95 vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
2
MediaTek Dimensity 8020 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
3
Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Samsung Exynos 8895
4
MediaTek Helio G88 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
5
MediaTek Dimensity 930 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
6
MediaTek Helio P60 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
7
Unisoc Tiger T612 vs Apple A16 Bionic
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
9
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 vs MediaTek Dimensity 810
10
HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1