MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs Unisoc Tiger T618
The Unisoc Tiger T618 and MediaTek Dimensity 700 are two processors that are often compared for their specifications. Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T618, it features a CPU architecture consisting of 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This processor has a total of 8 cores, making it suitable for multitasking and handling multiple processes simultaneously. It operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. The Tiger T618 has a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 watts, ensuring efficient power consumption. Additionally, it incorporates a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for accelerated AI tasks.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 presents a similar CPU architecture with 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Like the Tiger T618, it also boasts 8 cores, allowing for efficient multitasking. The processor operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and features a lithography of 7 nm, indicating a more advanced manufacturing process. The Dimensity 700 also maintains a TDP of 10 watts.
Comparing these two processors, we can see that they share similarities in terms of CPU architecture, number of cores, instruction set, and TDP. However, there are notable differences as well. The Tiger T618 has a lithography of 12 nm, while the Dimensity 700 has a lithography of 7 nm, suggesting that the latter offers better power efficiency and potentially improved performance. Furthermore, the Tiger T618 incorporates an NPU, which enhances its AI capabilities. In this regard, the Dimensity 700 does not specifically mention an NPU.
Overall, both the Unisoc Tiger T618 and MediaTek Dimensity 700 are commendable processors that offer efficient multitasking and high-performance capabilities. The Dimensity 700 stands out with its more advanced manufacturing process, potentially leading to improved power efficiency, while the Tiger T618's inclusion of an NPU enhances its AI processing abilities. Depending on the specific requirements and priorities of the user, either of these processors could be a suitable option for their needs.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 presents a similar CPU architecture with 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Like the Tiger T618, it also boasts 8 cores, allowing for efficient multitasking. The processor operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and features a lithography of 7 nm, indicating a more advanced manufacturing process. The Dimensity 700 also maintains a TDP of 10 watts.
Comparing these two processors, we can see that they share similarities in terms of CPU architecture, number of cores, instruction set, and TDP. However, there are notable differences as well. The Tiger T618 has a lithography of 12 nm, while the Dimensity 700 has a lithography of 7 nm, suggesting that the latter offers better power efficiency and potentially improved performance. Furthermore, the Tiger T618 incorporates an NPU, which enhances its AI capabilities. In this regard, the Dimensity 700 does not specifically mention an NPU.
Overall, both the Unisoc Tiger T618 and MediaTek Dimensity 700 are commendable processors that offer efficient multitasking and high-performance capabilities. The Dimensity 700 stands out with its more advanced manufacturing process, potentially leading to improved power efficiency, while the Tiger T618's inclusion of an NPU enhances its AI processing abilities. Depending on the specific requirements and priorities of the user, either of these processors could be a suitable option for their needs.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | 2 |
Shaders | 32 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@90Hz | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 64M |
Max Video Capture | 2K@30FPS | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 1 | 2019 August |
Partnumber | MT6833V/ZA, MT6833V/NZA | T618 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio G35 vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
2
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G vs MediaTek Helio G95
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 vs Apple A10 Fusion
4
MediaTek Dimensity 1050 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690
5
Apple A14 Bionic vs Unisoc SC9863A
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 vs Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G
7
Samsung Exynos 7870 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
9
MediaTek Helio P95 vs Google Tensor G1
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 vs Samsung Exynos 9820