MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs Unisoc Tiger T616
The Unisoc Tiger T616 and the MediaTek Dimensity 700 are two processors that are commonly used in smartphones and other devices. While they both have some similarities in terms of CPU cores and instruction set, they also have some notable differences in their specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T616, it features a CPU architecture consisting of 2 Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. This processor has a total of 8 cores, which allows for efficient multitasking and improved overall performance. In addition, it uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with various applications. The lithography of the Unisoc Tiger T616 is 12 nm, meaning it is manufactured using a 12-nanometer process, which helps reduce power consumption and heat generation.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 has a similar CPU architecture to the Unisoc Tiger T616. It consists of 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2 GHz. This configuration also provides a total of 8 cores, allowing for efficient multitasking and smooth performance. Like the Unisoc Tiger T616, the Dimensity 700 uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with various applications. However, one key difference is its lithography, which is 7 nm. This means that the Dimensity 700 is manufactured using a 7-nanometer process, making it more power-efficient and capable of delivering higher performance.
In terms of thermal design power (TDP), both processors have a TDP of 10 watts. This indicates the maximum amount of power that the processors are designed to consume and dissipate as heat during operation. With similar TDP, they can be considered as power-efficient options.
In summary, while the Unisoc Tiger T616 and the MediaTek Dimensity 700 have some similarities such as the number of cores and instruction set, they also have notable differences. The Dimensity 700 stands out with its smaller lithography, which results in improved power efficiency and potentially higher performance. However, both processors offer efficient multitasking and can be suitable choices for various devices, depending on the specific requirements and preferences of the user.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T616, it features a CPU architecture consisting of 2 Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. This processor has a total of 8 cores, which allows for efficient multitasking and improved overall performance. In addition, it uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with various applications. The lithography of the Unisoc Tiger T616 is 12 nm, meaning it is manufactured using a 12-nanometer process, which helps reduce power consumption and heat generation.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 has a similar CPU architecture to the Unisoc Tiger T616. It consists of 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2 GHz. This configuration also provides a total of 8 cores, allowing for efficient multitasking and smooth performance. Like the Unisoc Tiger T616, the Dimensity 700 uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with various applications. However, one key difference is its lithography, which is 7 nm. This means that the Dimensity 700 is manufactured using a 7-nanometer process, making it more power-efficient and capable of delivering higher performance.
In terms of thermal design power (TDP), both processors have a TDP of 10 watts. This indicates the maximum amount of power that the processors are designed to consume and dissipate as heat during operation. With similar TDP, they can be considered as power-efficient options.
In summary, while the Unisoc Tiger T616 and the MediaTek Dimensity 700 have some similarities such as the number of cores and instruction set, they also have notable differences. The Dimensity 700 stands out with its smaller lithography, which results in improved power efficiency and potentially higher performance. However, both processors offer efficient multitasking and can be suitable choices for various devices, depending on the specific requirements and preferences of the user.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 750 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | 1 |
Shaders | 32 | 16 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@90Hz | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 32MP |
Max Video Capture | 2K@30FPS | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 1 | 2021 |
Partnumber | MT6833V/ZA, MT6833V/NZA | T616 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G vs Unisoc SC9832E
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 vs MediaTek Helio P35
3
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T606
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
5
MediaTek Helio A25 vs MediaTek Dimensity 900
6
Apple A10X Fusion vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus vs Samsung Exynos 9609
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 vs Apple A15 Bionic
9
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G
10
MediaTek Helio P90 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845