MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs Unisoc Tiger T612
The Unisoc Tiger T612 and MediaTek Dimensity 700 are two processors with notable specifications. Let's compare them in terms of CPU cores and architecture, number of cores, instruction set, lithography, and TDP.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T612 is equipped with 2 Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores also clocked at 1.8 GHz. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 features 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2 GHz. From this perspective, the Dimensity 700 has more powerful A76 cores compared to the Tiger T612's A75 cores.
Both processors have 8 cores in total, offering a similar level of multitasking capability. The instruction set for both processors is ARMv8.2-A, ensuring compatibility with a variety of software and applications.
Moving on to lithography, the Unisoc Tiger T612 has a 12 nm lithography, while the MediaTek Dimensity 700 boasts a more advanced 7 nm lithography. A lower lithography generally indicates a more power-efficient and potentially faster processor.
Both processors have a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 watts, which suggests similar power consumption and thermal performance.
In conclusion, while the Unisoc Tiger T612 and MediaTek Dimensity 700 have some similarities such as the number of cores, instruction set, and TDP, there are differences worth noting. The Dimensity 700 has more powerful A76 cores, a more advanced 7 nm lithography, which may result in better power efficiency and potentially superior performance. However, the Tiger T612 offers a combination of A75 and A55 cores. Overall, the choice between these processors depends on specific requirements and the desired balance between power, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T612 is equipped with 2 Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores also clocked at 1.8 GHz. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 features 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2 GHz. From this perspective, the Dimensity 700 has more powerful A76 cores compared to the Tiger T612's A75 cores.
Both processors have 8 cores in total, offering a similar level of multitasking capability. The instruction set for both processors is ARMv8.2-A, ensuring compatibility with a variety of software and applications.
Moving on to lithography, the Unisoc Tiger T612 has a 12 nm lithography, while the MediaTek Dimensity 700 boasts a more advanced 7 nm lithography. A lower lithography generally indicates a more power-efficient and potentially faster processor.
Both processors have a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 watts, which suggests similar power consumption and thermal performance.
In conclusion, while the Unisoc Tiger T612 and MediaTek Dimensity 700 have some similarities such as the number of cores, instruction set, and TDP, there are differences worth noting. The Dimensity 700 has more powerful A76 cores, a more advanced 7 nm lithography, which may result in better power efficiency and potentially superior performance. However, the Tiger T612 offers a combination of A75 and A55 cores. Overall, the choice between these processors depends on specific requirements and the desired balance between power, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | 1 |
Shaders | 32 | 16 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@90Hz | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 50MP |
Max Video Capture | 2K@30FPS | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 1 | 2022 January |
Partnumber | MT6833V/ZA, MT6833V/NZA | T612 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio P60 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
2
Samsung Exynos 990 vs Apple A14 Bionic
3
Samsung Exynos 9610 vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus vs Samsung Exynos 7904
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
6
Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
7
HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs MediaTek Helio G80
8
Samsung Exynos 8895 vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
9
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs MediaTek Helio P70
10
MediaTek Helio G96 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690