MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs Unisoc Tiger T612
The Unisoc Tiger T612 and MediaTek Dimensity 700 are two processors with notable specifications. Let's compare them in terms of CPU cores and architecture, number of cores, instruction set, lithography, and TDP.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T612 is equipped with 2 Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores also clocked at 1.8 GHz. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 features 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2 GHz. From this perspective, the Dimensity 700 has more powerful A76 cores compared to the Tiger T612's A75 cores.
Both processors have 8 cores in total, offering a similar level of multitasking capability. The instruction set for both processors is ARMv8.2-A, ensuring compatibility with a variety of software and applications.
Moving on to lithography, the Unisoc Tiger T612 has a 12 nm lithography, while the MediaTek Dimensity 700 boasts a more advanced 7 nm lithography. A lower lithography generally indicates a more power-efficient and potentially faster processor.
Both processors have a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 watts, which suggests similar power consumption and thermal performance.
In conclusion, while the Unisoc Tiger T612 and MediaTek Dimensity 700 have some similarities such as the number of cores, instruction set, and TDP, there are differences worth noting. The Dimensity 700 has more powerful A76 cores, a more advanced 7 nm lithography, which may result in better power efficiency and potentially superior performance. However, the Tiger T612 offers a combination of A75 and A55 cores. Overall, the choice between these processors depends on specific requirements and the desired balance between power, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T612 is equipped with 2 Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores also clocked at 1.8 GHz. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 features 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2 GHz. From this perspective, the Dimensity 700 has more powerful A76 cores compared to the Tiger T612's A75 cores.
Both processors have 8 cores in total, offering a similar level of multitasking capability. The instruction set for both processors is ARMv8.2-A, ensuring compatibility with a variety of software and applications.
Moving on to lithography, the Unisoc Tiger T612 has a 12 nm lithography, while the MediaTek Dimensity 700 boasts a more advanced 7 nm lithography. A lower lithography generally indicates a more power-efficient and potentially faster processor.
Both processors have a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 watts, which suggests similar power consumption and thermal performance.
In conclusion, while the Unisoc Tiger T612 and MediaTek Dimensity 700 have some similarities such as the number of cores, instruction set, and TDP, there are differences worth noting. The Dimensity 700 has more powerful A76 cores, a more advanced 7 nm lithography, which may result in better power efficiency and potentially superior performance. However, the Tiger T612 offers a combination of A75 and A55 cores. Overall, the choice between these processors depends on specific requirements and the desired balance between power, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Execution units | 2 | 1 |
| Shaders | 32 | 16 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@90Hz | 2400x1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 50MP |
| Max Video Capture | 2K@30FPS | FullHD@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 1 | 2022 January |
| Partnumber | MT6833V/ZA, MT6833V/NZA | T612 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio G81 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
3
MediaTek Helio G50 vs MediaTek Helio G90T
4
MediaTek Helio G100 vs MediaTek Dimensity 810
5
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G vs Samsung Exynos 1380
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
7
MediaTek Helio A25 vs HiSilicon Kirin 8020
8
MediaTek Dimensity 8020 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
9
MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801
10
Samsung Exynos 9610 vs MediaTek Helio P70