MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs Unisoc Tiger T610
The Unisoc Tiger T610 and the MediaTek Dimensity 700 are two processors with distinct specifications.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T610 features 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 is equipped with 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Both processors possess 8 cores, thereby ensuring efficient multitasking capabilities.
Regarding the instruction set, both processors share the same ARMv8.2-A instruction set. This compatibility with the latest instructions allows for enhanced performance and efficient execution of various tasks.
Another notable difference lies in the lithography of these processors. While the Unisoc Tiger T610 has a lithography of 12 nm, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 utilizes a more advanced 7 nm lithography. The smaller lithography size generally results in better power efficiency and improved performance.
Moreover, both processors boast a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts. A lower TDP indicates that these processors consume less power, which translates to longer battery life and reduced heat generation.
To summarize, the Unisoc Tiger T610 and the MediaTek Dimensity 700 differ primarily in terms of CPU core architecture and lithography. The Unisoc Tiger T610 features Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores running at 1.8 GHz, while the MediaTek Dimensity 700 incorporates Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores operating at 2.2 GHz and 2 GHz, respectively. Additionally, the Dimensity 700 utilizes a more advanced 7 nm lithography, offering potential advantages in power efficiency and overall performance. Both processors, however, share the same ARMv8.2-A instruction set and have a TDP of 10 Watts.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T610 features 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 is equipped with 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Both processors possess 8 cores, thereby ensuring efficient multitasking capabilities.
Regarding the instruction set, both processors share the same ARMv8.2-A instruction set. This compatibility with the latest instructions allows for enhanced performance and efficient execution of various tasks.
Another notable difference lies in the lithography of these processors. While the Unisoc Tiger T610 has a lithography of 12 nm, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 utilizes a more advanced 7 nm lithography. The smaller lithography size generally results in better power efficiency and improved performance.
Moreover, both processors boast a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts. A lower TDP indicates that these processors consume less power, which translates to longer battery life and reduced heat generation.
To summarize, the Unisoc Tiger T610 and the MediaTek Dimensity 700 differ primarily in terms of CPU core architecture and lithography. The Unisoc Tiger T610 features Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores running at 1.8 GHz, while the MediaTek Dimensity 700 incorporates Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores operating at 2.2 GHz and 2 GHz, respectively. Additionally, the Dimensity 700 utilizes a more advanced 7 nm lithography, offering potential advantages in power efficiency and overall performance. Both processors, however, share the same ARMv8.2-A instruction set and have a TDP of 10 Watts.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 614.4 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | 2 |
Shaders | 32 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@90Hz | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 32MP |
Max Video Capture | 2K@30FPS | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 1 | 2019 June |
Partnumber | MT6833V/ZA, MT6833V/NZA | T610 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio P90 vs Samsung Exynos 8890
2
Unisoc SC7731E vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
3
MediaTek Dimensity 1050 vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
4
Apple A15 Bionic vs MediaTek Helio P95
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
6
Samsung Exynos 9820 vs MediaTek Helio G37
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 vs Samsung Exynos 990
8
MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
9
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
10
Samsung Exynos 9825 vs Apple A10X Fusion