MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs Unisoc Tiger T606
The Unisoc Tiger T606 and MediaTek Dimensity 700 are two processors with different specifications but similar power consumption. Let's compare their specifications to see which one offers better performance.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, both processors have 8 cores. However, the Unisoc Tiger T606 features a combination of 2 Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores also clocked at 1.6 GHz. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 offers 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2 GHz.
When it comes to the instruction set, both processors support ARMv8.2-A. This means they are capable of executing advanced instructions required for modern applications.
In terms of lithography, the Unisoc Tiger T606 processor is manufactured using a 12 nm process, while the MediaTek Dimensity 700 is manufactured using a more advanced 7 nm process. This indicates that the Dimensity 700 is likely to be more power-efficient and generate less heat compared to the Tiger T606.
Both processors have a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 10 Watts, indicating that they consume the same amount of power and are suitable for mobile devices with similar power constraints.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 appears to have an edge over the Unisoc Tiger T606 in terms of architecture, lithography, and clock speeds. With its more powerful Cortex-A76 cores and 7 nm process, the Dimensity 700 is expected to deliver better performance while being more power-efficient. Therefore, if you are considering a device powered by one of these processors, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 may be a better choice.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, both processors have 8 cores. However, the Unisoc Tiger T606 features a combination of 2 Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores also clocked at 1.6 GHz. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 offers 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2 GHz.
When it comes to the instruction set, both processors support ARMv8.2-A. This means they are capable of executing advanced instructions required for modern applications.
In terms of lithography, the Unisoc Tiger T606 processor is manufactured using a 12 nm process, while the MediaTek Dimensity 700 is manufactured using a more advanced 7 nm process. This indicates that the Dimensity 700 is likely to be more power-efficient and generate less heat compared to the Tiger T606.
Both processors have a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 10 Watts, indicating that they consume the same amount of power and are suitable for mobile devices with similar power constraints.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 appears to have an edge over the Unisoc Tiger T606 in terms of architecture, lithography, and clock speeds. With its more powerful Cortex-A76 cores and 7 nm process, the Dimensity 700 is expected to deliver better performance while being more power-efficient. Therefore, if you are considering a device powered by one of these processors, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 may be a better choice.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Execution units | 2 | 1 |
| Shaders | 32 | 16 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@90Hz | 1600x900@90Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 24MP, 16MP + 8MP |
| Max Video Capture | 2K@30FPS | FullHD@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 1 | 2021 October |
| Partnumber | MT6833V/ZA, MT6833V/NZA | T606 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Apple A10 Fusion vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
2
Apple M5 (iPad) vs Samsung Exynos 1280
3
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430
4
Samsung Exynos 980 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
6
Google Tensor G1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
7
Apple M3 (iPad) vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
8
Samsung Exynos 7904 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
9
MediaTek Dimensity 1050 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs HiSilicon Kirin 659