MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs Unisoc Tiger T606
The Unisoc Tiger T606 and MediaTek Dimensity 700 are two processors with different specifications but similar power consumption. Let's compare their specifications to see which one offers better performance.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, both processors have 8 cores. However, the Unisoc Tiger T606 features a combination of 2 Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores also clocked at 1.6 GHz. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 offers 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2 GHz.
When it comes to the instruction set, both processors support ARMv8.2-A. This means they are capable of executing advanced instructions required for modern applications.
In terms of lithography, the Unisoc Tiger T606 processor is manufactured using a 12 nm process, while the MediaTek Dimensity 700 is manufactured using a more advanced 7 nm process. This indicates that the Dimensity 700 is likely to be more power-efficient and generate less heat compared to the Tiger T606.
Both processors have a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 10 Watts, indicating that they consume the same amount of power and are suitable for mobile devices with similar power constraints.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 appears to have an edge over the Unisoc Tiger T606 in terms of architecture, lithography, and clock speeds. With its more powerful Cortex-A76 cores and 7 nm process, the Dimensity 700 is expected to deliver better performance while being more power-efficient. Therefore, if you are considering a device powered by one of these processors, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 may be a better choice.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, both processors have 8 cores. However, the Unisoc Tiger T606 features a combination of 2 Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores also clocked at 1.6 GHz. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 offers 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2 GHz.
When it comes to the instruction set, both processors support ARMv8.2-A. This means they are capable of executing advanced instructions required for modern applications.
In terms of lithography, the Unisoc Tiger T606 processor is manufactured using a 12 nm process, while the MediaTek Dimensity 700 is manufactured using a more advanced 7 nm process. This indicates that the Dimensity 700 is likely to be more power-efficient and generate less heat compared to the Tiger T606.
Both processors have a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 10 Watts, indicating that they consume the same amount of power and are suitable for mobile devices with similar power constraints.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 appears to have an edge over the Unisoc Tiger T606 in terms of architecture, lithography, and clock speeds. With its more powerful Cortex-A76 cores and 7 nm process, the Dimensity 700 is expected to deliver better performance while being more power-efficient. Therefore, if you are considering a device powered by one of these processors, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 may be a better choice.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | 1 |
Shaders | 32 | 16 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@90Hz | 1600x900@90Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 24MP, 16MP + 8MP |
Max Video Capture | 2K@30FPS | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 1 | 2021 October |
Partnumber | MT6833V/ZA, MT6833V/NZA | T606 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
2
HiSilicon Kirin 980 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
3
Samsung Exynos 7884B vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
4
MediaTek Helio G88 vs Unisoc Tiger T700
5
Unisoc Tiger T612 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
7
Samsung Exynos 7880 vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
8
MediaTek Helio G25 vs Apple A11 Bionic
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 vs Apple A17 Pro
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G