MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs Unisoc SC9863A
The Unisoc SC9863A and MediaTek Dimensity 700 are two processors with different specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc SC9863A, it features an architecture that consists of 4x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores and 4x 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This processor is equipped with a total of 8 cores, allowing for efficient multitasking. It operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 28 nm. The TDP (Thermal Design Power) for the SC9863A is 3 Watts, indicating a relatively low power consumption. Additionally, it is integrated with an NPU (Neural Processing Unit) for enhanced processing capabilities.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 features an architecture consisting of 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Like the SC9863A, it also has a total of 8 cores, which enables smooth performance. The Dimensity 700 operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 7 nm, indicating a more advanced manufacturing process compared to the SC9863A. However, its TDP is slightly higher at 10 Watts.
In summary, the Unisoc SC9863A and MediaTek Dimensity 700 have distinct specifications. The SC9863A utilizes an architecture with equal clock speeds for its cores, while the Dimensity 700 has higher clock speeds for its primary cores. While the SC9863A has a 28 nm lithography, the Dimensity 700 employs a more advanced 7 nm lithography. Comparing the TDP, the SC9863A consumes less power at 3 Watts compared to the Dimensity 700's 10 Watts. Both processors are equipped with 8 cores and operate on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the SC9863A stands out with its inclusion of an NPU for neural processing, providing additional functionalities. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors will depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the user or device.
Starting with the Unisoc SC9863A, it features an architecture that consists of 4x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores and 4x 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This processor is equipped with a total of 8 cores, allowing for efficient multitasking. It operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 28 nm. The TDP (Thermal Design Power) for the SC9863A is 3 Watts, indicating a relatively low power consumption. Additionally, it is integrated with an NPU (Neural Processing Unit) for enhanced processing capabilities.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 features an architecture consisting of 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Like the SC9863A, it also has a total of 8 cores, which enables smooth performance. The Dimensity 700 operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 7 nm, indicating a more advanced manufacturing process compared to the SC9863A. However, its TDP is slightly higher at 10 Watts.
In summary, the Unisoc SC9863A and MediaTek Dimensity 700 have distinct specifications. The SC9863A utilizes an architecture with equal clock speeds for its cores, while the Dimensity 700 has higher clock speeds for its primary cores. While the SC9863A has a 28 nm lithography, the Dimensity 700 employs a more advanced 7 nm lithography. Comparing the TDP, the SC9863A consumes less power at 3 Watts compared to the Dimensity 700's 10 Watts. Both processors are equipped with 8 cores and operate on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the SC9863A stands out with its inclusion of an NPU for neural processing, providing additional functionalities. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors will depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the user or device.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 4x 1.2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 28 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 3 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP2 | Imagination PowerVR GE8322 |
GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | PowerVR Rogue |
GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 550 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | 4 |
Shaders | 32 | 128 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 3.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@90Hz | 2160x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 16MP + 1x 5MP |
Max Video Capture | 2K@30FPS | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 4 (802.11n) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 1 | 2018 November |
Partnumber | MT6833V/ZA, MT6833V/NZA | SC9863A |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio P95 vs Apple M4 (iPad)
2
HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs MediaTek Helio P70
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 vs MediaTek Helio G90
4
MediaTek Dimensity 1200 vs Unisoc Tiger T620
5
Unisoc Tiger T606 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
6
MediaTek Dimensity 1000 vs Samsung Exynos 7904
7
HiSilicon Kirin 8000 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
8
MediaTek Helio G200 vs HiSilicon Kirin 930
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
10
Apple A18 Pro vs MediaTek Helio P90