MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs Unisoc SC9832E
The Unisoc SC9832E and MediaTek Dimensity 700 are two processors with distinct specifications. Let's compare them based on their key features.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc SC9832E is equipped with 4 Cortex-A53 cores running at a clock speed of 1.4 GHz. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 boasts a more advanced architecture with 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz, accompanied by 6 Cortex-A55 cores running at 2 GHz. It is evident that the MediaTek Dimensity 700 offers a higher number of cores and a more powerful architecture, ensuring better performance.
Moving on to the lithography, the Unisoc SC9832E has a 28 nm lithography, whereas the MediaTek Dimensity 700 features an impressive 7 nm lithography. A smaller lithography leads to improved power efficiency and better heat control, making the Dimensity 700 a more advanced and energy-efficient choice compared to the SC9832E.
In terms of instruction set, both processors support the ARMv8 architecture. However, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, providing it with an advantage over the Unisoc SC9832E in terms of performance and efficiency.
Lastly, let's consider the thermal design power (TDP). The Unisoc SC9832E has a TDP of 7 watts, while the MediaTek Dimensity 700 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 watts. A higher TDP may indicate that the Dimensity 700 consumes more power, but this can also signify its ability to handle more demanding tasks and provide better performance.
Overall, it is evident that the MediaTek Dimensity 700 outperforms the Unisoc SC9832E in terms of architecture, lithography, instruction set, and possibly performance. With its superior specifications, the Dimensity 700 is likely to offer a more efficient and powerful experience for users seeking high-performance processors.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc SC9832E is equipped with 4 Cortex-A53 cores running at a clock speed of 1.4 GHz. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 boasts a more advanced architecture with 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz, accompanied by 6 Cortex-A55 cores running at 2 GHz. It is evident that the MediaTek Dimensity 700 offers a higher number of cores and a more powerful architecture, ensuring better performance.
Moving on to the lithography, the Unisoc SC9832E has a 28 nm lithography, whereas the MediaTek Dimensity 700 features an impressive 7 nm lithography. A smaller lithography leads to improved power efficiency and better heat control, making the Dimensity 700 a more advanced and energy-efficient choice compared to the SC9832E.
In terms of instruction set, both processors support the ARMv8 architecture. However, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, providing it with an advantage over the Unisoc SC9832E in terms of performance and efficiency.
Lastly, let's consider the thermal design power (TDP). The Unisoc SC9832E has a TDP of 7 watts, while the MediaTek Dimensity 700 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 watts. A higher TDP may indicate that the Dimensity 700 consumes more power, but this can also signify its ability to handle more demanding tasks and provide better performance.
Overall, it is evident that the MediaTek Dimensity 700 outperforms the Unisoc SC9832E in terms of architecture, lithography, instruction set, and possibly performance. With its superior specifications, the Dimensity 700 is likely to offer a more efficient and powerful experience for users seeking high-performance processors.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.4 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 28 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 7 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 2 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR3 |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 667 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-T820 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Midgard |
GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 680 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | 1 |
Shaders | 32 | 4 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 1.2 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@90Hz | 1440x720 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 13MP |
Max Video Capture | 2K@30FPS | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.15 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.05 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 4 (802.11n) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 1 | 2018 |
Partnumber | MT6833V/ZA, MT6833V/NZA | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Unisoc Tiger T618 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
2
MediaTek Dimensity 930 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
3
MediaTek Dimensity 6020 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
4
MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus vs MediaTek Helio P65
5
Google Tensor G3 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F
8
MediaTek Dimensity 1000L vs Unisoc Tiger T612
9
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 vs Apple A16 Bionic
10
MediaTek Helio G88 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845