MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs Unisoc SC7731E
The Unisoc SC7731E and MediaTek Dimensity 700 are two popular processors used in mobile devices. Let's compare their specifications to see how they differ.
Starting with the Unisoc SC7731E, it is built on a 28nm lithography process and features a quad-core CPU. The architecture used is Cortex-A7, with each core clocked at 1.3 GHz. This processor has an ARMv7-A instruction set and a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 7 Watts.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 is manufactured using a more advanced 7nm lithography process. It boasts an octa-core CPU with two high-performance Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and six energy-efficient Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2 GHz. The instruction set used is ARMv8.2-A, which is newer than the SC7731E. The Dimensity 700 has a higher TDP of 10 Watts.
Comparing the number of cores, the Dimensity 700 has an advantage with its eight cores, providing better multitasking capabilities. Additionally, the use of more efficient cores helps optimize power consumption, contributing to longer battery life.
In terms of architecture, the Dimensity 700's Cortex-A76 cores are newer and more powerful than the Cortex-A7 cores used in the SC7731E. This results in improved overall performance and better handling of resource-intensive tasks.
The lithography process also plays a role in power efficiency and performance. With a smaller 7nm process, the Dimensity 700 benefits from better thermal management and potentially higher clock speeds.
Looking at the TDP, both processors have relatively low power consumption, but the Dimensity 700 has a slightly higher TDP, which may be due to its more powerful cores.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 outperforms the Unisoc SC7731E in terms of architecture, core count, and lithography process. It offers better performance, power efficiency, and multitasking capabilities. However, it's worth noting that the specific requirements and use cases of a device will determine which processor is the better choice in a given scenario.
Starting with the Unisoc SC7731E, it is built on a 28nm lithography process and features a quad-core CPU. The architecture used is Cortex-A7, with each core clocked at 1.3 GHz. This processor has an ARMv7-A instruction set and a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 7 Watts.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 is manufactured using a more advanced 7nm lithography process. It boasts an octa-core CPU with two high-performance Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and six energy-efficient Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2 GHz. The instruction set used is ARMv8.2-A, which is newer than the SC7731E. The Dimensity 700 has a higher TDP of 10 Watts.
Comparing the number of cores, the Dimensity 700 has an advantage with its eight cores, providing better multitasking capabilities. Additionally, the use of more efficient cores helps optimize power consumption, contributing to longer battery life.
In terms of architecture, the Dimensity 700's Cortex-A76 cores are newer and more powerful than the Cortex-A7 cores used in the SC7731E. This results in improved overall performance and better handling of resource-intensive tasks.
The lithography process also plays a role in power efficiency and performance. With a smaller 7nm process, the Dimensity 700 benefits from better thermal management and potentially higher clock speeds.
Looking at the TDP, both processors have relatively low power consumption, but the Dimensity 700 has a slightly higher TDP, which may be due to its more powerful cores.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 outperforms the Unisoc SC7731E in terms of architecture, core count, and lithography process. It offers better performance, power efficiency, and multitasking capabilities. However, it's worth noting that the specific requirements and use cases of a device will determine which processor is the better choice in a given scenario.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.3 GHz – Cortex-A7 |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv7-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 28 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 7 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 1 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR3 |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 533 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-T820 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Midgard |
GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 600 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | 1 |
Shaders | 32 | 4 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 1.2 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@90Hz | 1440x720 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 8MP |
Max Video Capture | 2K@30FPS | HD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 4 (802.11n) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 1 | 2018 Quarter 2 |
Partnumber | MT6833V/ZA, MT6833V/NZA | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 9610 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
2
HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
3
Samsung Exynos 9825 vs Unisoc Tiger T700
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 vs Apple A11 Bionic
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs Samsung Exynos 8895
7
HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs Apple A15 Bionic
8
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus vs MediaTek Helio P60
9
MediaTek Helio G95 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
10
Samsung Exynos 9611 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F