MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs MediaTek Dimensity 920
The MediaTek Dimensity 700 and MediaTek Dimensity 920 are two processors that are worth comparing based on their specifications.
Starting with the MediaTek Dimensity 700, it features an architecture that consists of 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2 GHz. With a total of 8 cores, this processor is capable of handling various tasks efficiently. It operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and is built on a 7 nm lithography. The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of this processor is 10 watts, which is a measure of its power consumption.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 boasts a more powerful architecture. It includes 2 Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. These cores provide enhanced performance compared to the Dimensity 700. Similar to its counterpart, it supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has 8 cores for efficient multitasking. What sets it apart is the lithography - the Dimensity 920 is built on a 6 nm lithography, which means it offers improved power efficiency compared to the Dimensity 700. The TDP of this processor is also 10 watts. Additionally, the Dimensity 920 includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) which helps accelerate AI-related tasks.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 surpasses the Dimensity 700 in both performance and power efficiency. With its more advanced architecture and lower lithography, it offers better computational capabilities while consuming the same amount of power. The inclusion of an NPU further enhances its AI-related capabilities. However, the choice between the two processors ultimately depends on the specific requirements and budget of the user.
Starting with the MediaTek Dimensity 700, it features an architecture that consists of 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2 GHz. With a total of 8 cores, this processor is capable of handling various tasks efficiently. It operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and is built on a 7 nm lithography. The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of this processor is 10 watts, which is a measure of its power consumption.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 boasts a more powerful architecture. It includes 2 Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. These cores provide enhanced performance compared to the Dimensity 700. Similar to its counterpart, it supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has 8 cores for efficient multitasking. What sets it apart is the lithography - the Dimensity 920 is built on a 6 nm lithography, which means it offers improved power efficiency compared to the Dimensity 700. The TDP of this processor is also 10 watts. Additionally, the Dimensity 920 includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) which helps accelerate AI-related tasks.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 surpasses the Dimensity 700 in both performance and power efficiency. With its more advanced architecture and lower lithography, it offers better computational capabilities while consuming the same amount of power. The inclusion of an NPU further enhances its AI-related capabilities. However, the choice between the two processors ultimately depends on the specific requirements and budget of the user.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 6 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G68 MP4 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 950 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | 4 |
Shaders | 32 | 96 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@90Hz | 2520x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP |
Max Video Capture | 2K@30FPS | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 6 (802.11ax) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 1 | 2021 Quarter 3 |
Partnumber | MT6833V/ZA, MT6833V/NZA | MT6877T |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Unisoc Tiger T310 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 vs HiSilicon Kirin 950
3
Google Tensor G2 vs MediaTek Helio G88
4
HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
5
Samsung Exynos 1380 vs Samsung Exynos 9609
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G vs MediaTek Dimensity 920
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus vs Apple A15 Bionic
8
MediaTek Helio G35 vs MediaTek Helio P60
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020
10
Unisoc SC9832E vs MediaTek Helio G80