MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs MediaTek Dimensity 900
The MediaTek Dimensity 700 and MediaTek Dimensity 900 are both powerful processors, but they have some key differences in their specifications.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Dimensity 700 features 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the Dimensity 900 boasts 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This indicates that the Dimensity 900 has a higher clock speed for its powerful cores, potentially leading to better performance.
Both processors have 8 cores and are based on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, which ensures compatibility with a wide range of software and applications.
In terms of lithography, the Dimensity 700 is built on a 7 nm process, while the Dimensity 900 utilizes a more advanced 6 nm process. A smaller lithography generally means improved power efficiency, which can result in longer battery life and reduced heat generation.
Interestingly, the Dimensity 900 also boasts a higher number of transistors with 10,000 million, compared to the Dimensity 700, which does not specify the number of transistors in its specifications. More transistors generally indicate a more complex and powerful processor.
Another significant difference between the two processors is the presence of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) in the Dimensity 900. NPUs are specialized hardware components designed to accelerate machine learning tasks, offering improved AI performance. The Dimensity 700, on the other hand, does not mention the inclusion of an NPU.
Both processors operate at a similar thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts, which means they consume the same amount of power during operation.
In conclusion, while the MediaTek Dimensity 700 is a capable processor with a decent clock speed and advanced instruction set, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 exceeds it in several areas. With a higher clock speed, smaller lithography, the presence of an NPU, and an impressive number of transistors, the Dimensity 900 offers a more powerful and efficient processing experience.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Dimensity 700 features 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the Dimensity 900 boasts 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This indicates that the Dimensity 900 has a higher clock speed for its powerful cores, potentially leading to better performance.
Both processors have 8 cores and are based on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, which ensures compatibility with a wide range of software and applications.
In terms of lithography, the Dimensity 700 is built on a 7 nm process, while the Dimensity 900 utilizes a more advanced 6 nm process. A smaller lithography generally means improved power efficiency, which can result in longer battery life and reduced heat generation.
Interestingly, the Dimensity 900 also boasts a higher number of transistors with 10,000 million, compared to the Dimensity 700, which does not specify the number of transistors in its specifications. More transistors generally indicate a more complex and powerful processor.
Another significant difference between the two processors is the presence of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) in the Dimensity 900. NPUs are specialized hardware components designed to accelerate machine learning tasks, offering improved AI performance. The Dimensity 700, on the other hand, does not mention the inclusion of an NPU.
Both processors operate at a similar thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts, which means they consume the same amount of power during operation.
In conclusion, while the MediaTek Dimensity 700 is a capable processor with a decent clock speed and advanced instruction set, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 exceeds it in several areas. With a higher clock speed, smaller lithography, the presence of an NPU, and an impressive number of transistors, the Dimensity 900 offers a more powerful and efficient processing experience.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 6 nm |
Number of transistors | 10000 million | |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G68 MP4 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 900 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | 4 |
Shaders | 32 | 64 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@90Hz | 2520x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP |
Max Video Capture | 2K@30FPS | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 6 (802.11ax) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 1 | 2021 Quarter 1 |
Partnumber | MT6833V/ZA, MT6833V/NZA | MT6877 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Unisoc Tiger T700 vs Unisoc SC9863A
2
MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus vs Unisoc SC7731E
3
MediaTek Dimensity 8000 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
4
MediaTek Helio G96 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F
5
MediaTek Helio P65 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
6
HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G
7
MediaTek Helio G35 vs Unisoc Tiger T610
8
Samsung Exynos 8890 vs Google Tensor G1
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 vs Samsung Exynos 1280
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs Samsung Exynos 1330