MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs MediaTek Dimensity 810
The MediaTek Dimensity 700 and Dimensity 810 processors are both powerful options, but they have slightly different specifications that set them apart.
Starting with the MediaTek Dimensity 700, it features a CPU architecture consisting of 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With 8 cores in total, this processor is capable of handling a range of tasks efficiently. It operates on an ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 7 nm, making it energy-efficient. The thermal design power (TDP) of the Dimensity 700 is 10 Watts.
Moving on to the MediaTek Dimensity 810, it boasts a slightly more powerful CPU architecture. It includes 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Like the Dimensity 700, it also has 8 cores with an ARMv8.2-A instruction set. The Dimensity 810 processor stands out with its upgraded lithography of 6 nm and an impressive 12000 million transistors, indicating increased performance capabilities. It has a lower TDP of 8 Watts. Additionally, the Dimensity 810 includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances AI and machine learning capabilities.
While both processors provide a strong performance, the Dimensity 810 offers a slight edge with its improved lithography and additional NPU feature. The 6 nm lithography allows for better power efficiency and potentially higher clock speeds. The inclusion of the NPU also enhances the processor's ability to handle AI-related tasks.
Ultimately, the decision between the MediaTek Dimensity 700 and Dimensity 810 will depend on specific requirements and priorities. If power efficiency and AI capabilities are essential, the Dimensity 810 would be the preferable choice. However, the Dimensity 700 still offers robust performance and may be more cost-effective for certain users.
Starting with the MediaTek Dimensity 700, it features a CPU architecture consisting of 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With 8 cores in total, this processor is capable of handling a range of tasks efficiently. It operates on an ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 7 nm, making it energy-efficient. The thermal design power (TDP) of the Dimensity 700 is 10 Watts.
Moving on to the MediaTek Dimensity 810, it boasts a slightly more powerful CPU architecture. It includes 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Like the Dimensity 700, it also has 8 cores with an ARMv8.2-A instruction set. The Dimensity 810 processor stands out with its upgraded lithography of 6 nm and an impressive 12000 million transistors, indicating increased performance capabilities. It has a lower TDP of 8 Watts. Additionally, the Dimensity 810 includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances AI and machine learning capabilities.
While both processors provide a strong performance, the Dimensity 810 offers a slight edge with its improved lithography and additional NPU feature. The 6 nm lithography allows for better power efficiency and potentially higher clock speeds. The inclusion of the NPU also enhances the processor's ability to handle AI-related tasks.
Ultimately, the decision between the MediaTek Dimensity 700 and Dimensity 810 will depend on specific requirements and priorities. If power efficiency and AI capabilities are essential, the Dimensity 810 would be the preferable choice. However, the Dimensity 700 still offers robust performance and may be more cost-effective for certain users.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 6 nm |
Number of transistors | 12000 million | |
TDP | 10 Watt | 8 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 12 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 950 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | 2 |
Shaders | 32 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@90Hz | 2520x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP |
Max Video Capture | 2K@30FPS | 2K@30FPS |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 1 | 2021 Quarter 3 |
Partnumber | MT6833V/ZA, MT6833V/NZA | MT6833V/PNZA, MT6833P |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Unisoc Tiger T606 vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 vs Unisoc SC7731E
3
Samsung Exynos 7904 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
4
MediaTek Helio P70 vs Unisoc SC9863A
5
Samsung Exynos 9820 vs Samsung Exynos 1380
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 vs MediaTek Helio G88
7
MediaTek Dimensity 1300 vs Samsung Exynos 9611
8
Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100