MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
The MediaTek Dimensity 700 and Dimensity 800U are both powerful processors developed by MediaTek. While they have some similarities in their specifications, there are also notable differences that set them apart.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, both processors feature an octa-core setup. However, the Dimensity 700 utilizes a configuration of 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, while the Dimensity 800U offers a slightly higher clock speed with 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This suggests that the Dimensity 800U may provide a slight performance boost compared to the Dimensity 700, particularly in tasks that require higher processing power.
Both processors operate on an ARMv8.2-A instruction set and are manufactured using a 7nm lithography process. This means that they have efficient power consumption and can deliver a balance between performance and energy efficiency.
One significant difference between the two processors is the inclusion of Neural Processing Unit (NPU) in the Dimensity 800U. This component enhances the processor's capability to handle AI tasks, offering improved AI performance compared to the Dimensity 700.
The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of the Dimensity 700 is specified as 10 Watts, which indicates its power consumption under normal operating conditions. Unfortunately, information about the TDP for the Dimensity 800U is not provided in the given specifications.
Overall, both processors are formidable options for mobile devices, with the Dimensity 800U having a slight advantage in terms of CPU clock speed and the addition of an NPU for enhanced AI performance. However, factors such as power consumption and pricing should also be considered when selecting a processor for specific needs and budgets.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, both processors feature an octa-core setup. However, the Dimensity 700 utilizes a configuration of 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, while the Dimensity 800U offers a slightly higher clock speed with 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This suggests that the Dimensity 800U may provide a slight performance boost compared to the Dimensity 700, particularly in tasks that require higher processing power.
Both processors operate on an ARMv8.2-A instruction set and are manufactured using a 7nm lithography process. This means that they have efficient power consumption and can deliver a balance between performance and energy efficiency.
One significant difference between the two processors is the inclusion of Neural Processing Unit (NPU) in the Dimensity 800U. This component enhances the processor's capability to handle AI tasks, offering improved AI performance compared to the Dimensity 700.
The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of the Dimensity 700 is specified as 10 Watts, which indicates its power consumption under normal operating conditions. Unfortunately, information about the TDP for the Dimensity 800U is not provided in the given specifications.
Overall, both processors are formidable options for mobile devices, with the Dimensity 800U having a slight advantage in terms of CPU clock speed and the addition of an NPU for enhanced AI performance. However, factors such as power consumption and pricing should also be considered when selecting a processor for specific needs and budgets.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 12 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G57 MP3 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | 3 |
Shaders | 32 | 48 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@90Hz | 2520x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 64MP, 1x 20MP + 1x 16MP |
Max Video Capture | 2K@30FPS | 4K@30FPS |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 1 | 2020 Quarter 3 |
Partnumber | MT6833V/ZA, MT6833V/NZA | MT6853V, MT6853V/TNZA, MT6853/TNZA, MT6853T |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Apple A10X Fusion vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs MediaTek Helio G96
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs Samsung Exynos 2100
4
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
5
Samsung Exynos 8895 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
6
HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
7
HiSilicon Kirin 935 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 vs Unisoc Tiger T618
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs MediaTek Helio P60
10
Apple A11 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695