MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
The MediaTek Dimensity 700 and Dimensity 800U are both powerful processors developed by MediaTek. While they have some similarities in their specifications, there are also notable differences that set them apart.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, both processors feature an octa-core setup. However, the Dimensity 700 utilizes a configuration of 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, while the Dimensity 800U offers a slightly higher clock speed with 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This suggests that the Dimensity 800U may provide a slight performance boost compared to the Dimensity 700, particularly in tasks that require higher processing power.
Both processors operate on an ARMv8.2-A instruction set and are manufactured using a 7nm lithography process. This means that they have efficient power consumption and can deliver a balance between performance and energy efficiency.
One significant difference between the two processors is the inclusion of Neural Processing Unit (NPU) in the Dimensity 800U. This component enhances the processor's capability to handle AI tasks, offering improved AI performance compared to the Dimensity 700.
The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of the Dimensity 700 is specified as 10 Watts, which indicates its power consumption under normal operating conditions. Unfortunately, information about the TDP for the Dimensity 800U is not provided in the given specifications.
Overall, both processors are formidable options for mobile devices, with the Dimensity 800U having a slight advantage in terms of CPU clock speed and the addition of an NPU for enhanced AI performance. However, factors such as power consumption and pricing should also be considered when selecting a processor for specific needs and budgets.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, both processors feature an octa-core setup. However, the Dimensity 700 utilizes a configuration of 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, while the Dimensity 800U offers a slightly higher clock speed with 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This suggests that the Dimensity 800U may provide a slight performance boost compared to the Dimensity 700, particularly in tasks that require higher processing power.
Both processors operate on an ARMv8.2-A instruction set and are manufactured using a 7nm lithography process. This means that they have efficient power consumption and can deliver a balance between performance and energy efficiency.
One significant difference between the two processors is the inclusion of Neural Processing Unit (NPU) in the Dimensity 800U. This component enhances the processor's capability to handle AI tasks, offering improved AI performance compared to the Dimensity 700.
The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of the Dimensity 700 is specified as 10 Watts, which indicates its power consumption under normal operating conditions. Unfortunately, information about the TDP for the Dimensity 800U is not provided in the given specifications.
Overall, both processors are formidable options for mobile devices, with the Dimensity 800U having a slight advantage in terms of CPU clock speed and the addition of an NPU for enhanced AI performance. However, factors such as power consumption and pricing should also be considered when selecting a processor for specific needs and budgets.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 12 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G57 MP3 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | 3 |
Shaders | 32 | 48 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@90Hz | 2520x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 64MP, 1x 20MP + 1x 16MP |
Max Video Capture | 2K@30FPS | 4K@30FPS |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 1 | 2020 Quarter 3 |
Partnumber | MT6833V/ZA, MT6833V/NZA | MT6853V, MT6853V/TNZA, MT6853/TNZA, MT6853T |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
2
MediaTek Dimensity 1000L vs MediaTek Helio G90
3
Samsung Exynos 7420 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
4
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
5
MediaTek Helio G85 vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus vs MediaTek Helio G35
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
8
MediaTek Dimensity 930 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs Samsung Exynos 1280
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 vs Unisoc Tiger T310