MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
The MediaTek Dimensity 700 and MediaTek Dimensity 800 are two processors manufactured by MediaTek. While they have similar specifications in terms of lithography, instruction set, and thermal design power (TDP), there are some notable differences between the two processors.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Dimensity 700 features 8 cores divided into 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This configuration allows for a balanced performance, with the Cortex-A76 cores providing power for demanding tasks and the Cortex-A55 cores handling less intensive processes. On the other hand, the Dimensity 800 has 4 cores -- 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This means that the Dimensity 800 may not have the same multitasking capabilities as the Dimensity 700, but it can still handle moderate tasks efficiently.
Both processors utilize ARMv8.2-A instruction set, which ensures compatibility with a wide range of applications and operating systems. They also have the same 7 nm lithography, which indicates a high level of transistor density and power efficiency.
Where the Dimensity 800 sets itself apart is with its Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This dedicated hardware accelerator enhances the processor's ability to perform machine learning tasks and AI-related functions. The Dimensity 700 lacks this feature, limiting its AI capabilities in comparison to the Dimensity 800.
While both processors have a TDP of 10 watts, it is important to note that TDP is not the sole factor determining power consumption and efficiency. Other factors such as software optimization and the specific device the processor is integrated into can also impact power usage.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 and Dimensity 800 are two processors with their own strengths. The Dimensity 700 offers versatility with its 8-core architecture, providing efficient multitasking capabilities. On the other hand, the Dimensity 800 excels in AI-related tasks with its Neural Processing Unit. Ultimately, the choice between the two processors depends on the specific requirements and priorities of the device they will be used in.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Dimensity 700 features 8 cores divided into 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This configuration allows for a balanced performance, with the Cortex-A76 cores providing power for demanding tasks and the Cortex-A55 cores handling less intensive processes. On the other hand, the Dimensity 800 has 4 cores -- 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This means that the Dimensity 800 may not have the same multitasking capabilities as the Dimensity 700, but it can still handle moderate tasks efficiently.
Both processors utilize ARMv8.2-A instruction set, which ensures compatibility with a wide range of applications and operating systems. They also have the same 7 nm lithography, which indicates a high level of transistor density and power efficiency.
Where the Dimensity 800 sets itself apart is with its Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This dedicated hardware accelerator enhances the processor's ability to perform machine learning tasks and AI-related functions. The Dimensity 700 lacks this feature, limiting its AI capabilities in comparison to the Dimensity 800.
While both processors have a TDP of 10 watts, it is important to note that TDP is not the sole factor determining power consumption and efficiency. Other factors such as software optimization and the specific device the processor is integrated into can also impact power usage.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 and Dimensity 800 are two processors with their own strengths. The Dimensity 700 offers versatility with its 8-core architecture, providing efficient multitasking capabilities. On the other hand, the Dimensity 800 excels in AI-related tasks with its Neural Processing Unit. Ultimately, the choice between the two processors depends on the specific requirements and priorities of the device they will be used in.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G57 MP4 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | 4 |
Shaders | 32 | 64 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@90Hz | 2520x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP |
Max Video Capture | 2K@30FPS | 4K@30FPS |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 1 | 2020 Quarter 2 |
Partnumber | MT6833V/ZA, MT6833V/NZA | MT6873, MT6873V |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 930 vs Samsung Exynos 850
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
3
Unisoc Tiger T310 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
4
Samsung Exynos 1330 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
5
HiSilicon Kirin 970 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
6
MediaTek Helio P90 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
7
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
8
Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 vs Unisoc Tiger T612