HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G vs Samsung Exynos 2200
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G with Samsung Exynos 2200. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 2x 2.86 GHz – Cortex-A76 2x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2 3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710 4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv9-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Number of transistors | 8000 million | |
| TDP | 7 Watt | 7 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture, HiAI 2.0 | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 24 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G76 MP16 | Xclipse 920 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | Samsugn Xclipse |
| GPU frequency | 700 MHz | 555 MHz |
| Execution units | 16 | 3 |
| Shaders | 256 | 192 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3360x1440@60Hz | 3840x2160@120Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 200MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VC-1 VP8 VP9 |
AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 7.35 Gbps | |
| Peak Upload Speed | 3.67 Gbps | |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2019 Quarter 4 | 2022 Quarter 1 |
| Partnumber | S5E9925 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs Apple M3 (iPad)
3
MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs Unisoc T8300
4
MediaTek Dimensity 800U vs Google Tensor G5
5
MediaTek Helio G90T vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3
6
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
7
Samsung Exynos 9611 vs Apple M4 (iPad)
8
Samsung Exynos 7880 vs Apple A12 Bionic
9
Samsung Exynos 1380 vs MediaTek Dimensity 810
10
MediaTek Dimensity 9500s vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000