HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G vs Samsung Exynos 2200
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G with Samsung Exynos 2200. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 2x 2.86 GHz – Cortex-A76 2x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2 3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710 4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv9-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Number of transistors | 8000 million | |
| TDP | 7 Watt | 7 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture, HiAI 2.0 | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 24 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G76 MP16 | Xclipse 920 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | Samsugn Xclipse |
| GPU frequency | 700 MHz | 555 MHz |
| Execution units | 16 | 3 |
| Shaders | 256 | 192 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3360x1440@60Hz | 3840x2160@120Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 200MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VC-1 VP8 VP9 |
AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 7.35 Gbps | |
| Peak Upload Speed | 3.67 Gbps | |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2019 Quarter 4 | 2022 Quarter 1 |
| Partnumber | S5E9925 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
2
MediaTek Dimensity 8050 vs Samsung Exynos 1380
3
HiSilicon Kirin 9020 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300
4
Samsung Exynos 9820 vs Apple A13 Bionic
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 vs Apple A16 Bionic
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
7
MediaTek Dimensity 1050 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7350
9
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
10
Samsung Exynos 850 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7100