HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T700

When comparing two processors based on their specifications, several factors should be taken into consideration. Two such processors are the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G and the Unisoc Tiger T700.

Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G, it boasts an architecture that includes 1x 2.58 GHz Cortex-A76 core, 3x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 1.84 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This combination of cores provides a balance between performance and efficiency. Additionally, it operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 7 nm, allowing for better power efficiency and thermal management. With a TDP of 6 Watts, it ensures minimal power consumption. Notably, it also incorporates the Ascend D110 Lite and Ascend D100 Tiny neural processing units, along with the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture, enhancing its AI capabilities.

On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T700 offers an architecture that includes 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A5 cores. While it may not have as high-performance cores as the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G, it still provides a balanced combination of cores for everyday tasks. Like the Kirin processor, it operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, it has a slightly larger lithography of 12 nm, meaning it may not be as power-efficient as the Kirin processor. Additionally, it has a TDP of 10 Watts, indicating slightly higher power consumption.

Overall, the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G appears to have a slight advantage over the Unisoc Tiger T700 in terms of its specifications. With a more advanced architecture, lower lithography, lower TDP, and the inclusion of dedicated neural processing units, it offers better performance and power efficiency. However, the Unisoc Tiger T700 still presents a viable option for users looking for a well-rounded processor with a balanced combination of cores. Ultimately, the choice between the two processors will depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the user.