HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T618
VS
The HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G and Unisoc Tiger T618 are both powerful processors, but they differ in several key specifications.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 985 5G features a more advanced architecture, including 1x 2.58 GHz Cortex-A76 core, 3x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 1.84 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the Tiger T618 has 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While both processors have 8 cores in total, the Kirin 985 5G offers a wider range of performance options with its Cortex-A76 cores.
In terms of instruction set, both processors have ARMv8.2-A, which is the latest version offering improved efficiency and performance.
When it comes to lithography, the Kirin 985 5G has a clear advantage with its 7 nm process. In contrast, the Tiger T618 utilizes a larger 12 nm process. The smaller lithography of the Kirin 985 5G allows for greater power efficiency and thermal management.
In terms of TDP (Thermal Design Power), the Kirin 985 5G has a lower TDP of 6 Watts compared to the Tiger T618's 10 Watts. This means that the Kirin 985 5G is designed to consume less power and generate less heat, which can contribute to longer battery life and better overall system performance.
When it comes to Neural Processing Units (NPU), the Kirin 985 5G utilizes the Ascend D110 Lite + Ascend D100 Tiny with HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture. On the other hand, the Tiger T618 features its own NPU. Both processors support AI tasks, but the specific capabilities and performance of their NPUs may vary.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G offers a more advanced and power-efficient architecture with a broader performance spectrum compared to the Unisoc Tiger T618. However, the Tiger T618 still provides solid performance and includes its own NPU. The final choice will depend on specific requirements and priorities, such as power efficiency, AI capabilities, and overall system performance.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 985 5G features a more advanced architecture, including 1x 2.58 GHz Cortex-A76 core, 3x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 1.84 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the Tiger T618 has 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While both processors have 8 cores in total, the Kirin 985 5G offers a wider range of performance options with its Cortex-A76 cores.
In terms of instruction set, both processors have ARMv8.2-A, which is the latest version offering improved efficiency and performance.
When it comes to lithography, the Kirin 985 5G has a clear advantage with its 7 nm process. In contrast, the Tiger T618 utilizes a larger 12 nm process. The smaller lithography of the Kirin 985 5G allows for greater power efficiency and thermal management.
In terms of TDP (Thermal Design Power), the Kirin 985 5G has a lower TDP of 6 Watts compared to the Tiger T618's 10 Watts. This means that the Kirin 985 5G is designed to consume less power and generate less heat, which can contribute to longer battery life and better overall system performance.
When it comes to Neural Processing Units (NPU), the Kirin 985 5G utilizes the Ascend D110 Lite + Ascend D100 Tiny with HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture. On the other hand, the Tiger T618 features its own NPU. Both processors support AI tasks, but the specific capabilities and performance of their NPUs may vary.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G offers a more advanced and power-efficient architecture with a broader performance spectrum compared to the Unisoc Tiger T618. However, the Tiger T618 still provides solid performance and includes its own NPU. The final choice will depend on specific requirements and priorities, such as power efficiency, AI capabilities, and overall system performance.
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 2.58 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend D110 Lite + Ascend D100 Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 6 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.0 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G77 MP8 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| GPU Architecture | Valhall | Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 700 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Execution units | 8 | 2 |
| Shaders | 128 | 32 |
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | 2400x1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 64M |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fp | FullHD@60fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 1.4 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 2 | 2019 August |
| Partnumber | Hi6290 | T618 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs MediaTek Helio G88
2
MediaTek Helio P90 vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
3
MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs HiSilicon Kirin 955
4
Samsung Exynos 8895 vs Unisoc SC9832E
5
Samsung Exynos 9825 vs Unisoc SC7731E
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
7
Unisoc Tiger T606 vs Samsung Exynos 990
8
Apple A10X Fusion vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
9
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
10
MediaTek Dimensity 1100 vs Unisoc Tiger T700