HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T310
Based on these specifications, the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G processor has several advantages over the Unisoc Tiger T310.
Firstly, the Kirin 985 5G has a higher number of CPU cores, with a total of 8, compared to the T310's 4 cores. This allows for better multitasking and overall performance.
In terms of architecture, the Kirin 985 5G employs a combination of Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores, while the T310 uses Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores. The Cortex-A76 cores in the Kirin 985 5G are clocked at higher speeds, with one core reaching 2.58 GHz, compared to the T310's highest clocked core at 2 GHz. This implies that the Kirin 985 5G may offer better single-core performance.
Another important consideration is the lithography. The Kirin 985 5G is built on a 7 nm process, which is more advanced than the T310's 12 nm process. A smaller lithography generally means better power efficiency and performance.
Additionally, the Kirin 985 5G offers neural processing capabilities through its Ascend D110 Lite and Ascend D100 Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture. This can enhance AI and machine learning performance, which may be useful in applications such as image recognition and voice assistants.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G processor outperforms the Unisoc Tiger T310 in terms of CPU cores, architecture, lithography, and additional neural processing capabilities. This makes the Kirin 985 5G better suited for power-hungry tasks, multitasking, and AI-intensive applications.
Firstly, the Kirin 985 5G has a higher number of CPU cores, with a total of 8, compared to the T310's 4 cores. This allows for better multitasking and overall performance.
In terms of architecture, the Kirin 985 5G employs a combination of Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores, while the T310 uses Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores. The Cortex-A76 cores in the Kirin 985 5G are clocked at higher speeds, with one core reaching 2.58 GHz, compared to the T310's highest clocked core at 2 GHz. This implies that the Kirin 985 5G may offer better single-core performance.
Another important consideration is the lithography. The Kirin 985 5G is built on a 7 nm process, which is more advanced than the T310's 12 nm process. A smaller lithography generally means better power efficiency and performance.
Additionally, the Kirin 985 5G offers neural processing capabilities through its Ascend D110 Lite and Ascend D100 Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture. This can enhance AI and machine learning performance, which may be useful in applications such as image recognition and voice assistants.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G processor outperforms the Unisoc Tiger T310 in terms of CPU cores, architecture, lithography, and additional neural processing capabilities. This makes the Kirin 985 5G better suited for power-hungry tasks, multitasking, and AI-intensive applications.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 1x 2.58 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 3x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 6 Watt | |
Neural Processing | Ascend D110 Lite + Ascend D100 Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1333 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.0 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G77 MP8 | Imagination PowerVR GE8300 |
GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | PowerVR Rogue |
GPU frequency | 700 MHz | 660 MHz |
Execution units | 8 | 2 |
Shaders | 128 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 10 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 3.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | 1600x720 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 16MP + 1x 8MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fp | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 1.4 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 2 | 2019 April |
Partnumber | Hi6290 | T310 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 vs Samsung Exynos 1580
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G
3
MediaTek Helio G99 vs Samsung Exynos 2100
4
Samsung Exynos 2400 vs Samsung Exynos 7870
5
Google Tensor G2 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 vs HiSilicon Kirin 955
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 vs Samsung Exynos 9611
9
Apple A9 vs Samsung Exynos 7904
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 vs Unisoc Tiger T615