HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G
The HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G and Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G are two processors that offer 5G capabilities. While both processors share some similarities, they also have distinct differences in their specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G, it features a total of 8 CPU cores with a unique architecture. It comprises of 1x 2.58 GHz Cortex-A76, 3x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76, and 4x 1.84 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This combination provides a balance between performance and power efficiency. The Kirin 985 5G also operates at a lithography of 7 nm and has a thermal design power of 6 Watts. In terms of neural processing, it utilizes the Ascend D110 Lite and Ascend D100 Tiny, which are based on the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G also features 8 CPU cores but with a different architecture. It consists of 1x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A76, 3x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76, and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This configuration offers a slightly higher clock speed across all cores, potentially resulting in improved performance. The Tanggula T770 5G operates at a lithography of 6 nm, indicating a slightly more advanced manufacturing process. It has a thermal design power of 5 Watts and utilizes an NPU for neural processing.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G and Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G are two processors designed for 5G connectivity. While they both have 8 CPU cores and support ARMv8.2-A instruction set, they differ in their clock speeds, lithography, thermal design power, and neural processing methods. The Kirin 985 5G offers a more varied core configuration and utilizes the Ascend D110 Lite and Ascend D100 Tiny for neural processing. On the other hand, the Tanggula T770 5G features higher clock speeds and utilizes an NPU. Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the device or system they are being used in.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G, it features a total of 8 CPU cores with a unique architecture. It comprises of 1x 2.58 GHz Cortex-A76, 3x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76, and 4x 1.84 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This combination provides a balance between performance and power efficiency. The Kirin 985 5G also operates at a lithography of 7 nm and has a thermal design power of 6 Watts. In terms of neural processing, it utilizes the Ascend D110 Lite and Ascend D100 Tiny, which are based on the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G also features 8 CPU cores but with a different architecture. It consists of 1x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A76, 3x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76, and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This configuration offers a slightly higher clock speed across all cores, potentially resulting in improved performance. The Tanggula T770 5G operates at a lithography of 6 nm, indicating a slightly more advanced manufacturing process. It has a thermal design power of 5 Watts and utilizes an NPU for neural processing.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G and Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G are two processors designed for 5G connectivity. While they both have 8 CPU cores and support ARMv8.2-A instruction set, they differ in their clock speeds, lithography, thermal design power, and neural processing methods. The Kirin 985 5G offers a more varied core configuration and utilizes the Ascend D110 Lite and Ascend D100 Tiny for neural processing. On the other hand, the Tanggula T770 5G features higher clock speeds and utilizes an NPU. Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the device or system they are being used in.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 1x 2.58 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 6 nm |
TDP | 6 Watt | 5 Watt |
Neural Processing | Ascend D110 Lite + Ascend D100 Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 32 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G77 MP8 | Mali-G57 MP6 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 700 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 8 | 6 |
Shaders | 128 | 96 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | 2160x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 108MP, 2x 24MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fp | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 1.4 Gbps | 2.7 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 2 | 2021 February |
Partnumber | Hi6290 | T770, Tiger T7520 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G vs Samsung Exynos 7904
3
MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
4
MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs Samsung Exynos 9825
5
Samsung Exynos 2100 vs Unisoc SC9863A
6
Samsung Exynos 850 vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
10
MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712