HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G
The HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G and Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G are two processors that offer 5G capabilities. While both processors share some similarities, they also have distinct differences in their specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G, it features a total of 8 CPU cores with a unique architecture. It comprises of 1x 2.58 GHz Cortex-A76, 3x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76, and 4x 1.84 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This combination provides a balance between performance and power efficiency. The Kirin 985 5G also operates at a lithography of 7 nm and has a thermal design power of 6 Watts. In terms of neural processing, it utilizes the Ascend D110 Lite and Ascend D100 Tiny, which are based on the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G also features 8 CPU cores but with a different architecture. It consists of 1x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A76, 3x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76, and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This configuration offers a slightly higher clock speed across all cores, potentially resulting in improved performance. The Tanggula T770 5G operates at a lithography of 6 nm, indicating a slightly more advanced manufacturing process. It has a thermal design power of 5 Watts and utilizes an NPU for neural processing.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G and Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G are two processors designed for 5G connectivity. While they both have 8 CPU cores and support ARMv8.2-A instruction set, they differ in their clock speeds, lithography, thermal design power, and neural processing methods. The Kirin 985 5G offers a more varied core configuration and utilizes the Ascend D110 Lite and Ascend D100 Tiny for neural processing. On the other hand, the Tanggula T770 5G features higher clock speeds and utilizes an NPU. Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the device or system they are being used in.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G, it features a total of 8 CPU cores with a unique architecture. It comprises of 1x 2.58 GHz Cortex-A76, 3x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76, and 4x 1.84 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This combination provides a balance between performance and power efficiency. The Kirin 985 5G also operates at a lithography of 7 nm and has a thermal design power of 6 Watts. In terms of neural processing, it utilizes the Ascend D110 Lite and Ascend D100 Tiny, which are based on the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G also features 8 CPU cores but with a different architecture. It consists of 1x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A76, 3x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76, and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This configuration offers a slightly higher clock speed across all cores, potentially resulting in improved performance. The Tanggula T770 5G operates at a lithography of 6 nm, indicating a slightly more advanced manufacturing process. It has a thermal design power of 5 Watts and utilizes an NPU for neural processing.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G and Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G are two processors designed for 5G connectivity. While they both have 8 CPU cores and support ARMv8.2-A instruction set, they differ in their clock speeds, lithography, thermal design power, and neural processing methods. The Kirin 985 5G offers a more varied core configuration and utilizes the Ascend D110 Lite and Ascend D100 Tiny for neural processing. On the other hand, the Tanggula T770 5G features higher clock speeds and utilizes an NPU. Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the device or system they are being used in.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 1x 2.58 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 6 nm |
TDP | 6 Watt | 5 Watt |
Neural Processing | Ascend D110 Lite + Ascend D100 Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 32 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G77 MP8 | Mali-G57 MP6 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 700 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 8 | 6 |
Shaders | 128 | 96 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | 2160x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 108MP, 2x 24MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fp | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 1.4 Gbps | 2.7 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 2 | 2021 February |
Partnumber | Hi6290 | T770, Tiger T7520 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 1380 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
2
Samsung Exynos 8895 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
3
Samsung Exynos 8890 vs Unisoc Tiger T606
4
Samsung Exynos 9610 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000
5
Samsung Exynos 980 vs MediaTek Helio G90T
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 vs MediaTek Helio G96
7
Samsung Exynos 850 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
8
Samsung Exynos 1280 vs MediaTek Helio P65
9
Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G
10
HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100