HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs Samsung Exynos 9825
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G with Samsung Exynos 9825. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 2.58 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.73 GHz – Exynos M4 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Number of transistors | 8500 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | |
| Neural Processing | Ascend D110 Lite + Ascend D100 Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.0 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G77 MP8 | Mali-G76 MP12 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 700 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Execution units | 8 | 12 |
| Shaders | 128 | 192 |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.3 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | 3840x2400 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 32MP, 2x 16MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fp | 8K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 1.4 Gbps | 2 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 0.316 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 2 | 2019 Quarter 3 |
| Partnumber | Hi6290 | S5E9825 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
2
Apple A19 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000S
3
Unisoc T8300 vs MediaTek Helio G85
4
Unisoc T820 vs MediaTek Helio P35
5
Unisoc Tiger T616 vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
6
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 vs Unisoc Tiger T700
7
Samsung Exynos 9810 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020
8
MediaTek Helio G80 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
9
Google Tensor G2 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000