HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs Samsung Exynos 9810
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G with Samsung Exynos 9810. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 2.58 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.9 GHz – Exynos M3 4x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| Number of transistors | 5300 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 5 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend D110 Lite + Ascend D100 Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 6 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x32 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.0 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G77 MP8 | Mali-G72 MP18 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 700 MHz | 570 MHz |
| Execution units | 8 | 18 |
| Shaders | 128 | 288 |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.3 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | 3840x2400@90Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 28MP, 2x 16MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fp | 4K@120fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 1.4 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 0.2 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 2 | 2018 Quarter 1 |
| Partnumber | Hi6290 | S5E9810 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 9609 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
2
Unisoc SC9863A vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400
3
Samsung Exynos 2400e vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
5
MediaTek Dimensity 8000 vs MediaTek Helio A22
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 vs Samsung Exynos 7870
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
8
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
10
MediaTek Helio G200 vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G