HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs Samsung Exynos 9611
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G with Samsung Exynos 9611. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 2.58 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| Number of transistors | 3000 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 8 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend D110 Lite + Ascend D100 Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.0 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G77 MP8 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 700 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Execution units | 8 | 3 |
| Shaders | 128 | 48 |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | 2560x1600 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fp | 4K@120fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 1.4 Gbps | 0.6 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 0.15 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 2 | 2019 Quarter 3 |
| Partnumber | Hi6290 | S5E9611 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 vs Unisoc Tiger T606
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs Unisoc SC9832E
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
5
MediaTek Helio G80 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G
6
MediaTek Dimensity 1000L vs MediaTek Dimensity 900
7
MediaTek Dimensity 1050 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 2
8
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F
9
Unisoc Tiger T700 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690
10
MediaTek Dimensity 930 vs Samsung Exynos 850