HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs Samsung Exynos 9611
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G with Samsung Exynos 9611. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 2.58 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| Number of transistors | 3000 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 8 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend D110 Lite + Ascend D100 Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.0 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G77 MP8 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 700 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Execution units | 8 | 3 |
| Shaders | 128 | 48 |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | 2560x1600 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fp | 4K@120fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 1.4 Gbps | 0.6 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 0.15 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 2 | 2019 Quarter 3 |
| Partnumber | Hi6290 | S5E9611 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs Apple A14 Bionic
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400e
3
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
4
MediaTek Dimensity 8050 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
6
MediaTek Dimensity 930 vs Unisoc Tiger T616
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
8
Unisoc T8300 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
9
HiSilicon Kirin 970 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020
10
MediaTek MT6737 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500s