HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs Samsung Exynos 2400
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G with Samsung Exynos 2400. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 2.58 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 3.21 GHz – Cortex-X4 5x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720 4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 10 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv9.2-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 6 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend D110 Lite + Ascend D100 Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 24 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 4200 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.0 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G77 MP8 | Xclipse 940 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | RDNA |
| GPU frequency | 700 MHz | 1095 MHz |
| Execution units | 8 | 6 |
| Shaders | 128 | 768 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.3 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | 3840x2400 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 320MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fp | 8K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 1.4 Gbps | 9.64 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 2.55 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 7 (802.11be) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.4 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 2 | 2024 Quarter 1 |
| Partnumber | Hi6290 | S5E9945 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
Unisoc Tiger T700 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
2
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
3
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus vs Unisoc Tiger T620
4
HiSilicon Kirin 970 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
5
Samsung Exynos 1480 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs Apple A18 Pro
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 vs Apple M1 (iPad)
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 vs Samsung Exynos 1330