HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G with Qualcomm Snapdragon 865. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 2.58 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2.84 GHz – Cortex-A77 (Kryo 585 Prime) 3x 2.42 GHz – Cortex-A77 (Kryo 585 Gold) 4x 1.80 GHz – Cortex-A55 (Kryo 585 Silver) |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend D110 Lite + Ascend D100 Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture | Qualcomm Hexagon 698 |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 16 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2750 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.0 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G77 MP8 | Adreno 650 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Qualcomm Adreno 600 |
| GPU frequency | 700 MHz | 590 MHz |
| Execution units | 8 | 2 |
| Shaders | 128 | 512 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | 3840x2160@60Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 200MP, 2x 25MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fp | 8K@30fps, 4K@120fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 1.4 Gbps | 7.5 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 3 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 2 | 2019 Quarter 4 |
| Partnumber | Hi6290 | SM8250, SM8250-AB, SD865 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 980 vs Unisoc T8300
2
Apple A15 Bionic vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G
3
HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G vs Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 vs Unisoc SC7731E
5
MediaTek Helio G50 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
6
Apple M5 (iPad) vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430
7
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835
8
Apple M1 (iPad) vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
10
Unisoc Tiger T606 vs Samsung Exynos 1380