HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G with Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 2.58 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2.96 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold) 3x 2.42 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold) 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 (Kryo 485 Silver) |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Number of transistors | 6700 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 6 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend D110 Lite + Ascend D100 Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture | Qualcomm Hexagon 690 |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 16 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.0 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G77 MP8 | Adreno 640 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Qualcomm Adreno 600 |
| GPU frequency | 700 MHz | 675 MHz |
| Execution units | 8 | 3 |
| Shaders | 128 | 768 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | 3840x2160 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 192MP, 2x 22MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fp | 4K@120fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 1.4 Gbps | 5 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 1.24 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS SBAS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 2 | 2019 Quarter 3 |
| Partnumber | Hi6290 | SM8150-AC |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
Apple A14 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 vs Samsung Exynos 9611
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4
4
MediaTek Dimensity 7400 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
5
MediaTek Dimensity 7030 vs Samsung Exynos 8890
6
Samsung Exynos 9609 vs Unisoc Tiger T700
7
Samsung Exynos 1280 vs MediaTek Helio G35
8
MediaTek Dimensity 7360 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821
9
MediaTek Helio P22 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400
10
Samsung Exynos 9610 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020