HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G with Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 2.58 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2.96 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold) 3x 2.42 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold) 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 (Kryo 485 Silver) |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Number of transistors | 6700 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 6 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend D110 Lite + Ascend D100 Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture | Qualcomm Hexagon 690 |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 16 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.0 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G77 MP8 | Adreno 640 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Qualcomm Adreno 600 |
| GPU frequency | 700 MHz | 675 MHz |
| Execution units | 8 | 3 |
| Shaders | 128 | 768 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | 3840x2160 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 192MP, 2x 22MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fp | 4K@120fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 1.4 Gbps | 5 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 1.24 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS SBAS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 2 | 2019 Quarter 3 |
| Partnumber | Hi6290 | SM8150-AC |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
Apple A17 Pro vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
3
Unisoc Tiger T620 vs MediaTek Dimensity 920
4
Samsung Exynos 7870 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus
5
Apple A16 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2500
6
Unisoc Tiger T610 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400e
7
MediaTek Helio P70 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
8
Unisoc Tiger T710 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
9
HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
10
MediaTek Dimensity 8350 vs Samsung Exynos 1330