HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G

VS

Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G with Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?

AnTuTu 10

Total Score

Kirin 985 5G

467882

Snapdragon 768G

441857

GeekBench 6 Single-Core

Score

Kirin 985 5G

699

Snapdragon 768G

704

GeekBench 6 Multi-Core

Score

Kirin 985 5G

2593

Snapdragon 768G

1988

CPU cores and architecture

Architecture	1x 2.58 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55	1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 475 Prime) 1x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 475 Gold) 1x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 (Kryo 475 Silver)
Number of cores	8	8
Instruction Set	ARMv8.2-A	ARMv8.2-A
Lithography	7 nm	7 nm
TDP	6 Watt	5 Watt
Neural Processing	Ascend D110 Lite + Ascend D100 Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture	Qualcomm Hexagon 696

Memory (RAM)

Max amount	up to 12 GB	up to 12 GB
Memory type	LPDDR4X	LPDDR4X
Memory frequency	2133 MHz	2133 MHz
Memory-bus	4x16 bit	2x16 bit

Storage

Storage specification

UFS 3.0

Graphics

GPU name	Mali-G77 MP8	Adreno 620
GPU Architecture	Mali Valhall	Qualcomm Adreno 600
GPU frequency	700 MHz	750 MHz
Execution units	8	3
Shaders	128	192
DirectX	12	12
OpenCL API	2.1	2.0
OpenGL API	ES 3.2	ES 3.2
Vulkan API	1.2	1.1

Camera, Video, Display

Max screen resolution	3120x1440	2520x1080
Max camera resolution	1x 48MP, 2x 20MP	1x 192MP, 2x 22MP
Max Video Capture	4K@30fp	4K@30fps
Video codec support	H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9	H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9

Wireless

4G network	Yes	Yes
5G network	Yes	Yes
Peak Download Speed	1.4 Gbps	3.7 Gbps
Peak Upload Speed	0.2 Gbps	1.6 Gbps
Wi-Fi	5 (802.11ac)	6 (802.11ax)
Bluetooth	5.0	5.2
Satellite navigation	BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS	BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS SBAS