HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632

VS

Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G with Qualcomm Snapdragon 632. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?

AnTuTu 10

Total Score

Kirin 985 5G

467882

Snapdragon 632

144893

GeekBench 6 Single-Core

Score

Kirin 985 5G

699

Snapdragon 632

263

GeekBench 6 Multi-Core

Score

Kirin 985 5G

2593

Snapdragon 632

1048

CPU cores and architecture

Architecture	1x 2.58 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55	4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A73 (Kryo 250 Gold) 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 (Kryo 250 Silver)
Number of cores	8	8
Instruction Set	ARMv8.2-A	ARMv8-A
Lithography	7 nm	14 nm
Number of transistors		2000 million
TDP	6 Watt	5 Watt
Neural Processing	Ascend D110 Lite + Ascend D100 Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture	Qualcomm Hexagon 546

Memory (RAM)

Max amount	up to 12 GB	up to 8 GB
Memory type	LPDDR4X	LPDDR3
Memory frequency	2133 MHz	933 MHz
Memory-bus	4x16 bit	2x16 bit

Storage

Storage specification

UFS 3.0

eMMC 5.1

Graphics

GPU name	Mali-G77 MP8	Adreno 506
GPU Architecture	Mali Valhall	Qualcomm Adreno 500
GPU frequency	700 MHz	650 MHz
Execution units	8	1
Shaders	128	96
DirectX	12	12
OpenCL API	2.1	2.0
OpenGL API	ES 3.2	ES 3.1
Vulkan API	1.2	1.0

Camera, Video, Display

Max screen resolution	3120x1440	1920x1200
Max camera resolution	1x 48MP, 2x 20MP	1x 40MP, 2x 13MP
Max Video Capture	4K@30fp	4K@30fps
Video codec support	H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9	H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9

Wireless

4G network	Yes	Yes
5G network	Yes	Yes
Peak Download Speed	1.4 Gbps	0.3 Gbps
Peak Upload Speed	0.2 Gbps	0.15 Gbps
Wi-Fi	5 (802.11ac)	4 (802.11n)
Bluetooth	5.0	5.0
Satellite navigation	BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS	BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS SBAS