HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs MediaTek Dimensity 920
The HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G and MediaTek Dimensity 920 are two processors with different specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G, it features an architecture that consists of 1x 2.58 GHz Cortex-A76 core, 3x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 1.84 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. It has a total of 8 CPU cores and supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. With a lithography of 7 nm, it offers efficient power consumption. The TDP is rated at 6 Watts, making it an energy-efficient option. It also includes neural processing capabilities with the Ascend D110 Lite and Ascend D100 Tiny, utilizing the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 has an architecture consisting of 2x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Kirin 985, it has 8 CPU cores and supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. The Dimensity 920 boasts a smaller lithography of 6 nm, potentially providing improved power efficiency. Its TDP is rated slightly higher at 10 Watts. Additionally, the Dimensity 920 incorporates a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for enhanced AI capabilities.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, both processors offer a combination of high-performance and power-efficient cores. The Kirin 985 utilizes a higher number of Cortex-A76 cores, potentially offering better single-core performance. On the other hand, the Dimensity 920 features faster Cortex-A78 cores, which may provide better multi-core performance.
Regarding power consumption, the Kirin 985 has a lower TDP of 6 Watts compared to the Dimensity 920's 10 Watts. This suggests that the Kirin 985 may offer better power efficiency.
Lastly, the neural processing capabilities differ between the two processors. The Kirin 985 utilizes the Ascend D110 Lite and Ascend D100 Tiny, while the Dimensity 920 incorporates an NPU. It is difficult to directly compare these neural processing units without further information on their specific capabilities.
Overall, both the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G and MediaTek Dimensity 920 have their own unique specifications and features. The choice between them would depend on specific requirements such as performance, power efficiency, and the need for specialized neural processing capabilities.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G, it features an architecture that consists of 1x 2.58 GHz Cortex-A76 core, 3x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 1.84 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. It has a total of 8 CPU cores and supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. With a lithography of 7 nm, it offers efficient power consumption. The TDP is rated at 6 Watts, making it an energy-efficient option. It also includes neural processing capabilities with the Ascend D110 Lite and Ascend D100 Tiny, utilizing the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 has an architecture consisting of 2x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Kirin 985, it has 8 CPU cores and supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. The Dimensity 920 boasts a smaller lithography of 6 nm, potentially providing improved power efficiency. Its TDP is rated slightly higher at 10 Watts. Additionally, the Dimensity 920 incorporates a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for enhanced AI capabilities.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, both processors offer a combination of high-performance and power-efficient cores. The Kirin 985 utilizes a higher number of Cortex-A76 cores, potentially offering better single-core performance. On the other hand, the Dimensity 920 features faster Cortex-A78 cores, which may provide better multi-core performance.
Regarding power consumption, the Kirin 985 has a lower TDP of 6 Watts compared to the Dimensity 920's 10 Watts. This suggests that the Kirin 985 may offer better power efficiency.
Lastly, the neural processing capabilities differ between the two processors. The Kirin 985 utilizes the Ascend D110 Lite and Ascend D100 Tiny, while the Dimensity 920 incorporates an NPU. It is difficult to directly compare these neural processing units without further information on their specific capabilities.
Overall, both the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G and MediaTek Dimensity 920 have their own unique specifications and features. The choice between them would depend on specific requirements such as performance, power efficiency, and the need for specialized neural processing capabilities.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 1x 2.58 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 6 nm |
TDP | 6 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | Ascend D110 Lite + Ascend D100 Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G77 MP8 | Mali-G68 MP4 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 700 MHz | 950 MHz |
Execution units | 8 | 4 |
Shaders | 128 | 96 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | 2520x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fp | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 1.4 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 6 (802.11ax) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 2 | 2021 Quarter 3 |
Partnumber | Hi6290 | MT6877T |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Unisoc Tiger T710 vs MediaTek Helio G95
2
MediaTek Helio P35 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480
5
Unisoc Tiger T610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs Unisoc Tiger T700
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs MediaTek Helio G36
8
Samsung Exynos 9609 vs MediaTek Helio P65
9
Google Tensor G1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
10
Apple A16 Bionic vs Unisoc SC9863A