HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs MediaTek Dimensity 900
The HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G and MediaTek Dimensity 900 are two processors known for their powerful performance and efficiency. Let's compare their specifications to see how they differ and which one may be the better choice for your needs.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G, this processor features a combination of 1x 2.58 GHz Cortex-A76, 3x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76, and 4x 1.84 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of 8 cores, it offers a balance between high-performance and power-saving capabilities. The Kirin 985 5G operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 7 nm. It has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 6 Watt, indicating efficient power consumption. Additionally, it includes the Ascend D110 Lite and Ascend D100 Tiny Neural Processing Units (NPUs), utilizing HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture for enhanced AI capabilities.
Now let's turn our attention to the MediaTek Dimensity 900. This processor is built on a 6 nm architecture and consists of 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Like the Kirin 985 5G, it also features 8 cores, providing a good balance of performance and power efficiency. It operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and boasts an impressive 10,000 million transistors. The Dimensity 900 has a TDP of 10 Watt and includes its own Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for AI tasks.
Comparing the two processors, it is clear that their architectures and core configurations differ slightly. The Kirin 985 5G has a higher clock speed for its A76 cores, potentially offering better single-threaded performance. On the other hand, the Dimensity 900 features the newer 6 nm lithography and a higher transistor count, suggesting improved power efficiency and potentially better multi-threaded performance.
Ultimately, the choice between these two processors depends on your specific requirements. If you prioritize AI capabilities, the Kirin 985 5G's Ascend NPUs may be more suitable. However, if you value power efficiency and potential multi-threaded performance, the Dimensity 900's 6 nm lithography and transistor count may be advantageous. Consider your needs and preferences before making a decision on which processor would best suit your device.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G, this processor features a combination of 1x 2.58 GHz Cortex-A76, 3x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76, and 4x 1.84 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of 8 cores, it offers a balance between high-performance and power-saving capabilities. The Kirin 985 5G operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 7 nm. It has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 6 Watt, indicating efficient power consumption. Additionally, it includes the Ascend D110 Lite and Ascend D100 Tiny Neural Processing Units (NPUs), utilizing HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture for enhanced AI capabilities.
Now let's turn our attention to the MediaTek Dimensity 900. This processor is built on a 6 nm architecture and consists of 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Like the Kirin 985 5G, it also features 8 cores, providing a good balance of performance and power efficiency. It operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and boasts an impressive 10,000 million transistors. The Dimensity 900 has a TDP of 10 Watt and includes its own Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for AI tasks.
Comparing the two processors, it is clear that their architectures and core configurations differ slightly. The Kirin 985 5G has a higher clock speed for its A76 cores, potentially offering better single-threaded performance. On the other hand, the Dimensity 900 features the newer 6 nm lithography and a higher transistor count, suggesting improved power efficiency and potentially better multi-threaded performance.
Ultimately, the choice between these two processors depends on your specific requirements. If you prioritize AI capabilities, the Kirin 985 5G's Ascend NPUs may be more suitable. However, if you value power efficiency and potential multi-threaded performance, the Dimensity 900's 6 nm lithography and transistor count may be advantageous. Consider your needs and preferences before making a decision on which processor would best suit your device.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 1x 2.58 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 6 nm |
Number of transistors | 10000 million | |
TDP | 6 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | Ascend D110 Lite + Ascend D100 Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G77 MP8 | Mali-G68 MP4 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 700 MHz | 900 MHz |
Execution units | 8 | 4 |
Shaders | 128 | 64 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | 2520x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fp | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 1.4 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 6 (802.11ax) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 2 | 2021 Quarter 1 |
Partnumber | Hi6290 | MT6877 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 vs Unisoc Tiger T618
2
Apple A15 Bionic vs Unisoc Tiger T616
3
Samsung Exynos 2200 vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
5
Apple A10X Fusion vs Samsung Exynos 2100
6
Unisoc SC9832E vs MediaTek Helio P60
7
MediaTek Helio G35 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
8
MediaTek Dimensity 6080 vs Samsung Exynos 990
9
Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
10
HiSilicon Kirin 970 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1