HiSilicon Kirin 980 vs Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G
The HiSilicon Kirin 980 and Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G are two processors with distinct specifications, which can greatly impact the performance and capabilities of devices they power.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 980, it features a sophisticated architecture with a combination of powerful CPU cores. It includes 2x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, 2x 1.92 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This diverse combination allows for optimized performance across various tasks, from demanding applications to efficient power management. The Kirin 980 also boasts an ARMv8-A instruction set, which ensures compatibility with modern software and technology. Furthermore, the processor is built using a 7 nm lithography process, resulting in more efficient power consumption and heat management. With a high number of transistors, reaching 6900 million, the Kirin 980 can handle complex processes while maintaining a TDP of 6 Watts. Additionally, it is equipped with the HiSilicon Dual NPU, enhancing artificial intelligence capabilities and enabling advanced neural processing.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G offers its own unique specifications. Its architecture consists of 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While the T740 lacks the same diversity in CPU cores as the Kirin 980, it still provides a solid foundation for performance and power efficiency. The processor supports ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with modern applications. However, the Tanggula T740 is built using a 12 nm lithography process, which may not offer the same level of power efficiency as the Kirin 980's 7 nm process. Similar to the Kirin 980, the T740 features a dual NPU design, which enables neural processing and AI capabilities.
In summary, both the HiSilicon Kirin 980 and Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G processors have their own sets of advantages and limitations. The Kirin 980 stands out with its powerful and diverse CPU cores, advanced instruction set, and more efficient 7 nm lithography. On the other hand, the Tanggula T740 offers solid performance with its CPU architecture and also incorporates dual NPU technology for AI capabilities. The choice between these processors ultimately depends on specific device requirements and the desired balance between power, performance, and energy efficiency.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 980, it features a sophisticated architecture with a combination of powerful CPU cores. It includes 2x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, 2x 1.92 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This diverse combination allows for optimized performance across various tasks, from demanding applications to efficient power management. The Kirin 980 also boasts an ARMv8-A instruction set, which ensures compatibility with modern software and technology. Furthermore, the processor is built using a 7 nm lithography process, resulting in more efficient power consumption and heat management. With a high number of transistors, reaching 6900 million, the Kirin 980 can handle complex processes while maintaining a TDP of 6 Watts. Additionally, it is equipped with the HiSilicon Dual NPU, enhancing artificial intelligence capabilities and enabling advanced neural processing.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G offers its own unique specifications. Its architecture consists of 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While the T740 lacks the same diversity in CPU cores as the Kirin 980, it still provides a solid foundation for performance and power efficiency. The processor supports ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with modern applications. However, the Tanggula T740 is built using a 12 nm lithography process, which may not offer the same level of power efficiency as the Kirin 980's 7 nm process. Similar to the Kirin 980, the T740 features a dual NPU design, which enables neural processing and AI capabilities.
In summary, both the HiSilicon Kirin 980 and Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G processors have their own sets of advantages and limitations. The Kirin 980 stands out with its powerful and diverse CPU cores, advanced instruction set, and more efficient 7 nm lithography. On the other hand, the Tanggula T740 offers solid performance with its CPU architecture and also incorporates dual NPU technology for AI capabilities. The choice between these processors ultimately depends on specific device requirements and the desired balance between power, performance, and energy efficiency.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 2x 1.92 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 6900 million | |
TDP | 6 Watt | |
Neural Processing | HiSilicon Dual NPU | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G76 MP10 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 720 MHz | 800 MHz |
Execution units | 10 | |
Shaders | 160 | |
DirectX | 12 | |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | 2960x1440@60Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 32MP | 1x 64MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 1.4 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 0.75 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2018 Quarter 4 | 2020 Quarter 1 |
Partnumber | T740, Tiger T7510 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus vs Samsung Exynos 2200
2
Unisoc Tiger T612 vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
3
Unisoc Tiger T616 vs Samsung Exynos 850
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G
5
Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T310
6
MediaTek Dimensity 8020 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
7
MediaTek Helio P60 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs Samsung Exynos 7870
9
Samsung Exynos 980 vs Unisoc SC9832E
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 vs MediaTek Dimensity 810