HiSilicon Kirin 980 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 980 with Samsung Exynos 2200. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 2x 1.92 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2 3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710 4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv9-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Number of transistors | 6900 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 7 Watt |
| Neural Processing | HiSilicon Dual NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 24 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G76 MP10 | Xclipse 920 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | Samsugn Xclipse |
| GPU frequency | 720 MHz | 555 MHz |
| Execution units | 10 | 3 |
| Shaders | 160 | 192 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | 3840x2160@120Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 32MP | 1x 200MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Video codec support | AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 1.4 Gbps | 7.35 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 3.67 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2018 Quarter 4 | 2022 Quarter 1 |
| Partnumber | S5E9925 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Apple M1 (iPad)
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G vs HiSilicon Kirin 9020
3
Apple M4 (iPad) vs MediaTek Helio P60
4
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 4 vs Apple M5 (iPad)
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000
7
Unisoc Tiger T618 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G
8
Unisoc SC9832E vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
9
Samsung Exynos 1280 vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
10
Samsung Exynos 8890 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G