HiSilicon Kirin 980 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 980 with Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 2x 1.92 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex-A77 (Kryo 585 Prime) 3x 2.42 GHz – Cortex-A77 (Kryo 585 Gold) 4x 1.80 GHz – Cortex-A55 (Kryo 585 Silver) |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Number of transistors | 6900 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Neural Processing | HiSilicon Dual NPU | Qualcomm Hexagon 698 |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 16 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2750 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G76 MP10 | Adreno 650 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | Qualcomm Adreno 600 |
| GPU frequency | 720 MHz | 670 MHz |
| Execution units | 10 | 2 |
| Shaders | 160 | 512 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | 3840x2160@60Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 32MP | 1x 200MP, 2x 25MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 8K@30fps, 4K@120fps |
| Video codec support | AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 1.4 Gbps | 7.5 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 3 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS SBAS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2018 Quarter 4 | 2020 Quarter 3 |
| Partnumber | SM8250-AB | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
Unisoc Tiger T616 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
2
Samsung Exynos 1330 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 vs Unisoc SC9832E
4
MediaTek MT6739 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
6
MediaTek Helio G70 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430
7
MediaTek Dimensity 1080 vs Apple A17 Pro
8
MediaTek Dimensity 1050 vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
9
Samsung Exynos 9810 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
10
Google Tensor G2 vs MediaTek Helio G35