HiSilicon Kirin 970 vs Unisoc SC9863A
The HiSilicon Kirin 970 and the Unisoc SC9863A are two processors with different specifications. Let's compare them.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 970 has a more powerful configuration. It features 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the Unisoc SC9863A has 4x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores and 4x 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While the Kirin 970 has higher clock speeds and a mix of high-performance and power-efficient cores, the SC9863A has lower clock speeds and only power-efficient cores.
Moving on to other specifications, the HiSilicon Kirin 970 has an instruction set of ARMv8-A, allowing it to support modern software and applications. It is built on a 10 nm lithography process and contains 5500 million transistors. The TDP (thermal design power) for this processor is 9 Watts. Additionally, it features a HiSilicon NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which enhances performance in artificial intelligence tasks.
In comparison, the Unisoc SC9863A has an instruction set of ARMv8.2-A, which is a slightly newer version. However, it is built on a larger 28 nm lithography process, which is less power-efficient compared to the Kirin 970's 10 nm. The SC9863A has a lower TDP of 3 Watts, indicating that it consumes less power compared to the Kirin 970. Additionally, it also features an NPU, although the specifications of the NPU are not stated.
Based on these specifications, it is clear that the HiSilicon Kirin 970 is a more powerful processor compared to the Unisoc SC9863A. It has a higher-performance CPU configuration, a more advanced instruction set, and a more power-efficient lithography. However, it is important to consider the intended use case and budget when determining which processor is more suitable for a particular device or application.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 970 has a more powerful configuration. It features 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the Unisoc SC9863A has 4x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores and 4x 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While the Kirin 970 has higher clock speeds and a mix of high-performance and power-efficient cores, the SC9863A has lower clock speeds and only power-efficient cores.
Moving on to other specifications, the HiSilicon Kirin 970 has an instruction set of ARMv8-A, allowing it to support modern software and applications. It is built on a 10 nm lithography process and contains 5500 million transistors. The TDP (thermal design power) for this processor is 9 Watts. Additionally, it features a HiSilicon NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which enhances performance in artificial intelligence tasks.
In comparison, the Unisoc SC9863A has an instruction set of ARMv8.2-A, which is a slightly newer version. However, it is built on a larger 28 nm lithography process, which is less power-efficient compared to the Kirin 970's 10 nm. The SC9863A has a lower TDP of 3 Watts, indicating that it consumes less power compared to the Kirin 970. Additionally, it also features an NPU, although the specifications of the NPU are not stated.
Based on these specifications, it is clear that the HiSilicon Kirin 970 is a more powerful processor compared to the Unisoc SC9863A. It has a higher-performance CPU configuration, a more advanced instruction set, and a more power-efficient lithography. However, it is important to consider the intended use case and budget when determining which processor is more suitable for a particular device or application.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 4x 1.2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Number of transistors | 5500 million | |
| TDP | 9 Watt | 3 Watt |
| Neural Processing | HiSilicon NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 4 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G72 MP12 | Imagination PowerVR GE8322 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | PowerVR Rogue |
| GPU frequency | 750 MHz | 550 MHz |
| Execution units | 12 | 4 |
| Shaders | 192 | 128 |
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| OpenCL API | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 2160x1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 16MP + 1x 5MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 4 (802.11n) |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 4.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2017 September | 2018 November |
| Partnumber | Hi3670 | SC9863A |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio A25 vs MediaTek Helio P90
2
MediaTek Helio G90 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
4
MediaTek Helio P95 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
5
MediaTek Dimensity 9500 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4
6
MediaTek Helio G92 Max vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G
7
Unisoc Tiger T710 vs Apple A15 Bionic
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050
9
HiSilicon Kirin 8000 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G