HiSilicon Kirin 970 vs Unisoc SC9863A
The HiSilicon Kirin 970 and the Unisoc SC9863A are two processors with different specifications. Let's compare them.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 970 has a more powerful configuration. It features 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the Unisoc SC9863A has 4x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores and 4x 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While the Kirin 970 has higher clock speeds and a mix of high-performance and power-efficient cores, the SC9863A has lower clock speeds and only power-efficient cores.
Moving on to other specifications, the HiSilicon Kirin 970 has an instruction set of ARMv8-A, allowing it to support modern software and applications. It is built on a 10 nm lithography process and contains 5500 million transistors. The TDP (thermal design power) for this processor is 9 Watts. Additionally, it features a HiSilicon NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which enhances performance in artificial intelligence tasks.
In comparison, the Unisoc SC9863A has an instruction set of ARMv8.2-A, which is a slightly newer version. However, it is built on a larger 28 nm lithography process, which is less power-efficient compared to the Kirin 970's 10 nm. The SC9863A has a lower TDP of 3 Watts, indicating that it consumes less power compared to the Kirin 970. Additionally, it also features an NPU, although the specifications of the NPU are not stated.
Based on these specifications, it is clear that the HiSilicon Kirin 970 is a more powerful processor compared to the Unisoc SC9863A. It has a higher-performance CPU configuration, a more advanced instruction set, and a more power-efficient lithography. However, it is important to consider the intended use case and budget when determining which processor is more suitable for a particular device or application.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 970 has a more powerful configuration. It features 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the Unisoc SC9863A has 4x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores and 4x 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While the Kirin 970 has higher clock speeds and a mix of high-performance and power-efficient cores, the SC9863A has lower clock speeds and only power-efficient cores.
Moving on to other specifications, the HiSilicon Kirin 970 has an instruction set of ARMv8-A, allowing it to support modern software and applications. It is built on a 10 nm lithography process and contains 5500 million transistors. The TDP (thermal design power) for this processor is 9 Watts. Additionally, it features a HiSilicon NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which enhances performance in artificial intelligence tasks.
In comparison, the Unisoc SC9863A has an instruction set of ARMv8.2-A, which is a slightly newer version. However, it is built on a larger 28 nm lithography process, which is less power-efficient compared to the Kirin 970's 10 nm. The SC9863A has a lower TDP of 3 Watts, indicating that it consumes less power compared to the Kirin 970. Additionally, it also features an NPU, although the specifications of the NPU are not stated.
Based on these specifications, it is clear that the HiSilicon Kirin 970 is a more powerful processor compared to the Unisoc SC9863A. It has a higher-performance CPU configuration, a more advanced instruction set, and a more power-efficient lithography. However, it is important to consider the intended use case and budget when determining which processor is more suitable for a particular device or application.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 4x 1.2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 10 nm | 28 nm |
Number of transistors | 5500 million | |
TDP | 9 Watt | 3 Watt |
Neural Processing | HiSilicon NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G72 MP12 | Imagination PowerVR GE8322 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 750 MHz | 550 MHz |
Execution units | 12 | 4 |
Shaders | 192 | 128 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 2160x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 16MP + 1x 5MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 4 (802.11n) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2017 September | 2018 November |
Partnumber | Hi3670 | SC9863A |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs Apple A17 Pro
2
MediaTek Helio G25 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
3
MediaTek Helio P90 vs Samsung Exynos 7880
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G vs Samsung Exynos 7884B
5
MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs Samsung Exynos 990
6
Google Tensor G2 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690
7
MediaTek Dimensity 1000L vs MediaTek Dimensity 900
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs Apple A13 Bionic
9
Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
10
HiSilicon Kirin 710F vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660