HiSilicon Kirin 970 vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
The HiSilicon Kirin 970 and the MediaTek Dimensity 930 are two processors that can be compared based on their specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 970, it features an architecture that consists of 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores, providing a total of 8 cores. It operates on the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 10 nm. The Kirin 970 is built with 5500 million transistors and has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 9 Watts. Additionally, it includes the HiSilicon NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which enhances its processing capabilities for AI tasks.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 has an architecture that comprises 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, also resulting in a total of 8 cores. It runs on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and is fabricated using a more advanced 6 nm lithography. The Dimensity 930 has a TDP of 10 Watts and includes an NPU for neural processing tasks.
Comparing the two processors, it is evident that the HiSilicon Kirin 970 has a higher clock speed for its Cortex-A73 cores (2.4 GHz) compared to the Cortex-A78 cores in the MediaTek Dimensity 930 (2.2 GHz). However, the Dimensity 930 compensates for this with a higher clock speed for its Cortex-A55 cores (2.0 GHz). It is important to note that the Kirin 970 has a 10 nm lithography, while the Dimensity 930 has a more advanced 6 nm lithography. This indicates that the Dimensity 930 may potentially offer better power efficiency and heat management.
Both processors feature 8 cores, and while the Kirin 970 has the advantage of HiSilicon's NPU, the Dimensity 930 also boasts an NPU for neural processing tasks.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 970 and the MediaTek Dimensity 930 have their own unique set of specifications that may cater to different requirements. The Kirin 970 offers higher clock speeds for its faster cores but has a slightly larger lithography. On the other hand, the Dimensity 930 has a more advanced lithography and potentially better power efficiency. Both processors feature NPUs for AI tasks, providing added benefits in terms of neural processing capabilities.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 970, it features an architecture that consists of 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores, providing a total of 8 cores. It operates on the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 10 nm. The Kirin 970 is built with 5500 million transistors and has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 9 Watts. Additionally, it includes the HiSilicon NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which enhances its processing capabilities for AI tasks.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 has an architecture that comprises 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, also resulting in a total of 8 cores. It runs on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and is fabricated using a more advanced 6 nm lithography. The Dimensity 930 has a TDP of 10 Watts and includes an NPU for neural processing tasks.
Comparing the two processors, it is evident that the HiSilicon Kirin 970 has a higher clock speed for its Cortex-A73 cores (2.4 GHz) compared to the Cortex-A78 cores in the MediaTek Dimensity 930 (2.2 GHz). However, the Dimensity 930 compensates for this with a higher clock speed for its Cortex-A55 cores (2.0 GHz). It is important to note that the Kirin 970 has a 10 nm lithography, while the Dimensity 930 has a more advanced 6 nm lithography. This indicates that the Dimensity 930 may potentially offer better power efficiency and heat management.
Both processors feature 8 cores, and while the Kirin 970 has the advantage of HiSilicon's NPU, the Dimensity 930 also boasts an NPU for neural processing tasks.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 970 and the MediaTek Dimensity 930 have their own unique set of specifications that may cater to different requirements. The Kirin 970 offers higher clock speeds for its faster cores but has a slightly larger lithography. On the other hand, the Dimensity 930 has a more advanced lithography and potentially better power efficiency. Both processors feature NPUs for AI tasks, providing added benefits in terms of neural processing capabilities.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 10 nm | 6 nm |
Number of transistors | 5500 million | |
TDP | 9 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | HiSilicon NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR5 |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G72 MP12 | Imagination PowerVR BXM-8-256 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 750 MHz | 800 MHz |
Execution units | 12 | |
Shaders | 192 | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 2520x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 108MP, 1x 64MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 2K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2017 September | 2022 Quarter 3 |
Partnumber | Hi3670 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Apple A10X Fusion vs Samsung Exynos 990
2
Apple A11 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
4
Apple A12 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 vs MediaTek Helio P60
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs Samsung Exynos 1330
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 vs Google Tensor G2
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs Samsung Exynos 9609