HiSilicon Kirin 970 vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
The HiSilicon Kirin 970 and the HiSilicon Kirin 980 are two processors that offer high performance and power efficiency. Let's compare their specifications to see how they differ.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 970, it features an architecture of 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor is capable of handling multiple tasks efficiently. The instruction set used is ARMv8-A, which ensures compatibility with modern applications. The 10 nm lithography and 5500 million transistors contribute to its power efficiency, ensuring a lower TDP of 9 Watts. Additionally, the HiSilicon Kirin 970 includes the HiSilicon NPU (Neural Processing Unit), enabling faster and more efficient neural processing tasks.
Moving on to the HiSilicon Kirin 980, it takes a step forward in terms of performance and power efficiency. Its architecture consists of 2x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, 2x 1.92 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The addition of the Cortex-A76 cores results in improved single-core performance. Similar to the Kirin 970, it also has 8 cores and uses the ARMv8-A instruction set. However, the Kirin 980 takes advantage of a smaller lithography of 7 nm and boasts 6900 million transistors, making it more power-efficient and capable of delivering superior performance. With a lower TDP of 6 Watts, it ensures reduced heat output and power consumption. The HiSilicon Kirin 980 also features the HiSilicon Dual NPU, which further enhances its AI capabilities.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 offers notable advancements over its predecessor, the Kirin 970. With improved CPU cores, a smaller lithography, and a larger number of transistors, it delivers enhanced performance and power efficiency. The addition of the Dual NPU further strengthens its AI capabilities. Overall, the Kirin 980 is a more advanced processor that would be a better choice for users seeking top-notch performance and efficiency.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 970, it features an architecture of 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor is capable of handling multiple tasks efficiently. The instruction set used is ARMv8-A, which ensures compatibility with modern applications. The 10 nm lithography and 5500 million transistors contribute to its power efficiency, ensuring a lower TDP of 9 Watts. Additionally, the HiSilicon Kirin 970 includes the HiSilicon NPU (Neural Processing Unit), enabling faster and more efficient neural processing tasks.
Moving on to the HiSilicon Kirin 980, it takes a step forward in terms of performance and power efficiency. Its architecture consists of 2x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, 2x 1.92 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The addition of the Cortex-A76 cores results in improved single-core performance. Similar to the Kirin 970, it also has 8 cores and uses the ARMv8-A instruction set. However, the Kirin 980 takes advantage of a smaller lithography of 7 nm and boasts 6900 million transistors, making it more power-efficient and capable of delivering superior performance. With a lower TDP of 6 Watts, it ensures reduced heat output and power consumption. The HiSilicon Kirin 980 also features the HiSilicon Dual NPU, which further enhances its AI capabilities.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 offers notable advancements over its predecessor, the Kirin 970. With improved CPU cores, a smaller lithography, and a larger number of transistors, it delivers enhanced performance and power efficiency. The addition of the Dual NPU further strengthens its AI capabilities. Overall, the Kirin 980 is a more advanced processor that would be a better choice for users seeking top-notch performance and efficiency.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 2x 1.92 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
Lithography | 10 nm | 7 nm |
Number of transistors | 5500 million | 6900 million |
TDP | 9 Watt | 6 Watt |
Neural Processing | HiSilicon NPU | HiSilicon Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G72 MP12 | Mali-G76 MP10 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 750 MHz | 720 MHz |
Execution units | 12 | 10 |
Shaders | 192 | 160 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 3120x1440 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 48MP, 2x 32MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 1.4 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 6 (802.11ax) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2017 September | 2018 Quarter 4 |
Partnumber | Hi3670 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Flagship |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio A25 vs Apple A15 Bionic
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
4
MediaTek Helio G88 vs Samsung Exynos 9810
5
Apple A17 Pro vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
6
MediaTek Helio P90 vs MediaTek Helio G35
7
Unisoc Tiger T310 vs Samsung Exynos 9825
8
MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
9
MediaTek Helio G85 vs Apple A12 Bionic
10
MediaTek Helio G96 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710