HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G
When comparing the HiSilicon Kirin 960 and the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G processors, several specifications stand out.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 960 features 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G has 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Both processors have 8 cores, offering powerful performance for various tasks.
Regarding instruction set, the HiSilicon Kirin 960 utilizes ARMv8-A, whereas the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G employs ARMv8.2-A. This distinction suggests that the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G may have more advanced instruction capabilities.
Another factor to consider is the lithography or the process technology used to manufacture the processors. The HiSilicon Kirin 960 is manufactured using a 16 nm process, while the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G utilizes a 12 nm process. The smaller the lithography, the more efficient the processor tends to be in terms of power consumption and thermal management.
Furthermore, the HiSilicon Kirin 960 boasts 4000 million transistors, indicating a complex and intricate design. Meanwhile, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G offers dual NPUs (Neural Processing Units), potentially enhancing its capabilities in AI-related tasks.
Lastly, the HiSilicon Kirin 960 features a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 5 Watts, which signifies the amount of heat generated by the processor under normal operation. Unfortunately, TDP information for the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G is not provided.
In summary, both the HiSilicon Kirin 960 and the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G are powerful processors with eight cores. However, they differ in architecture, instruction set, lithography, and additional features like the number of transistors and neural processing units. These differences contribute to variations in performance, power consumption, and overall efficiency.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 960 features 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G has 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Both processors have 8 cores, offering powerful performance for various tasks.
Regarding instruction set, the HiSilicon Kirin 960 utilizes ARMv8-A, whereas the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G employs ARMv8.2-A. This distinction suggests that the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G may have more advanced instruction capabilities.
Another factor to consider is the lithography or the process technology used to manufacture the processors. The HiSilicon Kirin 960 is manufactured using a 16 nm process, while the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G utilizes a 12 nm process. The smaller the lithography, the more efficient the processor tends to be in terms of power consumption and thermal management.
Furthermore, the HiSilicon Kirin 960 boasts 4000 million transistors, indicating a complex and intricate design. Meanwhile, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G offers dual NPUs (Neural Processing Units), potentially enhancing its capabilities in AI-related tasks.
Lastly, the HiSilicon Kirin 960 features a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 5 Watts, which signifies the amount of heat generated by the processor under normal operation. Unfortunately, TDP information for the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G is not provided.
In summary, both the HiSilicon Kirin 960 and the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G are powerful processors with eight cores. However, they differ in architecture, instruction set, lithography, and additional features like the number of transistors and neural processing units. These differences contribute to variations in performance, power consumption, and overall efficiency.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 16 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 4000 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | |
Neural Processing | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G71 MP8 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 800 MHz |
Execution units | 8 | |
Shaders | 128 | |
DirectX | 11.3 | |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 4.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2960x1440@60Hz | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 20MP, 2x 12MP | 1x 64MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.75 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2016 October | 2020 Quarter 1 |
Partnumber | Hi3660 | T740, Tiger T7510 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G
3
MediaTek Dimensity 8020 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
4
HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
5
Samsung Exynos 990 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
6
MediaTek Dimensity 1000 vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
7
HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs MediaTek Helio G36