HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs Unisoc SC7731E
The HiSilicon Kirin 955 and the Unisoc SC7731E are two processors with distinct specifications. Let's analyze their differences and similarities.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 955 is equipped with 8 cores that are divided into two clusters: 4 x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4 x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the SC7731E features 4 cores with a 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 architecture. This indicates that the Kirin 955 has a more advanced architecture, offering better performance and processing capabilities compared to the SC7731E.
Regarding the instruction set, the Kirin 955 is based on the ARMv8-A instruction set, whereas the SC7731E operates on the ARMv7-A instruction set. ARMv8-A is newer and more advanced, providing better support for applications and operating systems.
In terms of lithography, the Kirin 955 uses a 16 nm process, while the SC7731E relies on a 28 nm process. A lower lithography process represents a more advanced manufacturing technology, which generally results in improved power efficiency and performance.
Moreover, the Kirin 955 boasts 2000 million transistors, indicating its potential for more complex calculations and tasks. In contrast, the SC7731E's transistor count is not specified.
In terms of power consumption, the Kirin 955 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watts, which suggests it is more power-efficient compared to the SC7731E with a TDP of 7 Watts. This implies that devices utilizing the Kirin 955 processor might offer better battery life.
In conclusion, it can be observed that the HiSilicon Kirin 955 outperforms the Unisoc SC7731E in terms of architecture, instruction set, lithography, transistor count, and power efficiency. These differences indicate that the Kirin 955 is likely to provide superior performance and capabilities compared to the SC7731E.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 955 is equipped with 8 cores that are divided into two clusters: 4 x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4 x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the SC7731E features 4 cores with a 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 architecture. This indicates that the Kirin 955 has a more advanced architecture, offering better performance and processing capabilities compared to the SC7731E.
Regarding the instruction set, the Kirin 955 is based on the ARMv8-A instruction set, whereas the SC7731E operates on the ARMv7-A instruction set. ARMv8-A is newer and more advanced, providing better support for applications and operating systems.
In terms of lithography, the Kirin 955 uses a 16 nm process, while the SC7731E relies on a 28 nm process. A lower lithography process represents a more advanced manufacturing technology, which generally results in improved power efficiency and performance.
Moreover, the Kirin 955 boasts 2000 million transistors, indicating its potential for more complex calculations and tasks. In contrast, the SC7731E's transistor count is not specified.
In terms of power consumption, the Kirin 955 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watts, which suggests it is more power-efficient compared to the SC7731E with a TDP of 7 Watts. This implies that devices utilizing the Kirin 955 processor might offer better battery life.
In conclusion, it can be observed that the HiSilicon Kirin 955 outperforms the Unisoc SC7731E in terms of architecture, instruction set, lithography, transistor count, and power efficiency. These differences indicate that the Kirin 955 is likely to provide superior performance and capabilities compared to the SC7731E.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A72 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 1.3 GHz – Cortex-A7 |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv7-A |
Lithography | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Number of transistors | 2000 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 7 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 1 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR3 |
Memory frequency | 1333 MHz | 533 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T880 MP4 | Mali-T820 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Midgard |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 600 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 1 |
Shaders | 64 | 4 |
DirectX | 11.2 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 1440x720 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 31MP, 2x 13MP | 1x 8MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | HD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 4 (802.11n) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2016 April | 2018 Quarter 2 |
Partnumber | Hi3655 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 9810 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
2
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
4
HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
5
Apple A14 Bionic vs HiSilicon Kirin 930
6
MediaTek Dimensity 720 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
7
MediaTek Helio G85 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
8
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
9
Samsung Exynos 7884B vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 vs MediaTek Helio P95