HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G
The HiSilicon Kirin 955 and the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G are both powerful processors with their own distinct specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 955, it features a total of eight cores, four of which are Cortex-A72 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz, while the other four are Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. This processor utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 16 nm. It packs around 2000 million transistors and operates at a TDP of 5 watts.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G also boasts a total of eight cores, divided into four Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and four Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. It utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a more advanced lithography of 6 nm, resulting in improved power efficiency. Like the Kirin 955, it operates at a TDP of 5 watts. Additionally, the Tanggula T760 5G includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for enhanced AI capabilities.
In terms of architecture, both processors utilize a combination of high-performance and power-efficient cores for a well-balanced performance. However, the Tanggula T760 5G's use of Cortex-A76 cores, which are newer and more powerful compared to the Cortex-A72 cores used in the Kirin 955, may result in better overall performance.
Furthermore, the Tanggula T760 5G's lithography of 6 nm showcases a more advanced fabrication process, which often leads to improved energy efficiency and lower power consumption. This, coupled with the inclusion of an NPU, allows the Tanggula T760 5G to potentially handle AI tasks more efficiently compared to the Kirin 955.
In summary, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G has advantages over the HiSilicon Kirin 955 in terms of the newer Cortex-A76 cores, more advanced lithography, and the inclusion of an NPU. These factors may contribute to improved overall performance and energy efficiency, especially in AI-related tasks.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 955, it features a total of eight cores, four of which are Cortex-A72 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz, while the other four are Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. This processor utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 16 nm. It packs around 2000 million transistors and operates at a TDP of 5 watts.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G also boasts a total of eight cores, divided into four Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and four Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. It utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a more advanced lithography of 6 nm, resulting in improved power efficiency. Like the Kirin 955, it operates at a TDP of 5 watts. Additionally, the Tanggula T760 5G includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for enhanced AI capabilities.
In terms of architecture, both processors utilize a combination of high-performance and power-efficient cores for a well-balanced performance. However, the Tanggula T760 5G's use of Cortex-A76 cores, which are newer and more powerful compared to the Cortex-A72 cores used in the Kirin 955, may result in better overall performance.
Furthermore, the Tanggula T760 5G's lithography of 6 nm showcases a more advanced fabrication process, which often leads to improved energy efficiency and lower power consumption. This, coupled with the inclusion of an NPU, allows the Tanggula T760 5G to potentially handle AI tasks more efficiently compared to the Kirin 955.
In summary, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G has advantages over the HiSilicon Kirin 955 in terms of the newer Cortex-A76 cores, more advanced lithography, and the inclusion of an NPU. These factors may contribute to improved overall performance and energy efficiency, especially in AI-related tasks.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A72 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 16 nm | 6 nm |
Number of transistors | 2000 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 5 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1333 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T880 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP6 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 6 |
Shaders | 64 | 96 |
DirectX | 11.2 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2160x1080 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 31MP, 2x 13MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 2.7 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2016 April | 2021 February |
Partnumber | Hi3655 | T760 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 1050 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
2
Unisoc Tiger T618 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821
3
Samsung Exynos 8895 vs Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
5
Apple A16 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 1380
6
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T310
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 vs MediaTek Helio G80
8
MediaTek Dimensity 1300 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
9
Samsung Exynos 7880 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
10
MediaTek Dimensity 1200 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000