HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
The HiSilicon Kirin 955 and MediaTek Dimensity 800 are two processors that offer different specifications and features.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 955, it features a CPU architecture consisting of 4x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor provides a balanced mix of performance and power efficiency. It supports the ARMv8-A instruction set and is built using a 16 nm lithography process. The Kirin 955 also boasts a total of 2000 million transistors, indicating a high level of integration. Additionally, it has a TDP of 5 Watts, which suggests a relatively low power consumption.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 utilizes a different CPU architecture. It combines 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 cores with 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of 8 cores as well, this processor focuses more on performance with its high-performance Cortex-A76 cores. It supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and is fabricated using a smaller 7 nm lithography process. Furthermore, the Dimensity 800 has a TDP of 10 Watts, indicating a slightly higher power consumption compared to the Kirin 955. Additionally, it also boasts a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which allows for more efficient AI processing.
In summary, while both processors offer octa-core configurations, the HiSilicon Kirin 955 features a higher clock speed for its high-performance cores and a lower power consumption. Meanwhile, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 highlights performance with its high-performance cores and incorporates an NPU for enhanced AI processing. Overall, the choice between these processors would depend on specific requirements such as power efficiency or AI processing capabilities.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 955, it features a CPU architecture consisting of 4x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor provides a balanced mix of performance and power efficiency. It supports the ARMv8-A instruction set and is built using a 16 nm lithography process. The Kirin 955 also boasts a total of 2000 million transistors, indicating a high level of integration. Additionally, it has a TDP of 5 Watts, which suggests a relatively low power consumption.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 utilizes a different CPU architecture. It combines 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 cores with 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of 8 cores as well, this processor focuses more on performance with its high-performance Cortex-A76 cores. It supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and is fabricated using a smaller 7 nm lithography process. Furthermore, the Dimensity 800 has a TDP of 10 Watts, indicating a slightly higher power consumption compared to the Kirin 955. Additionally, it also boasts a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which allows for more efficient AI processing.
In summary, while both processors offer octa-core configurations, the HiSilicon Kirin 955 features a higher clock speed for its high-performance cores and a lower power consumption. Meanwhile, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 highlights performance with its high-performance cores and incorporates an NPU for enhanced AI processing. Overall, the choice between these processors would depend on specific requirements such as power efficiency or AI processing capabilities.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A72 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 16 nm | 7 nm |
Number of transistors | 2000 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1333 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T880 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP4 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 4 |
Shaders | 64 | 64 |
DirectX | 11.2 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 31MP, 2x 13MP | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | 4K@30FPS |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.1 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2016 April | 2020 Quarter 2 |
Partnumber | Hi3655 | MT6873, MT6873V |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio G70 vs Unisoc Tiger T606
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 vs MediaTek Helio G90
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
4
Unisoc Tiger T612 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
5
Apple A10X Fusion vs MediaTek Helio P70
6
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 vs MediaTek Dimensity 720
7
Samsung Exynos 2100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
8
HiSilicon Kirin 970 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
9
Apple A16 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G