HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
The HiSilicon Kirin 955 and Kirin 985 5G are both powerful processors produced by Huawei's subsidiary, HiSilicon. While they share some similarities, there are also notable differences in their specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 955, it features a combination of four Cortex-A72 cores, clocked at 2.5 GHz, and four Cortex-A53 cores, clocked at 1.8 GHz. With a total of eight cores, this processor offers a balanced performance for various tasks. It utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 16 nm. The Kirin 955 houses around 2000 million transistors and has a thermal design power (TDP) of 5 Watts.
On the other hand, the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G offers a more advanced architecture and specifications. It incorporates one Cortex-A76 core, clocked at 2.58 GHz, three Cortex-A76 cores, clocked at 2.4 GHz, and four Cortex-A55 cores, clocked at 1.84 GHz. This combination provides a higher level of performance and efficiency. The Kirin 985 5G adopts the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and benefits from a more advanced 7 nm lithography. Additionally, it has a TDP of 6 Watts.
One of the standout features of the Kirin 985 5G is its neural processing capabilities. It features the Ascend D110 Lite and Ascend D100 Tiny neural processing units, which are based on Huawei's Da Vinci Architecture. This allows for enhanced artificial intelligence and machine learning capabilities, providing advanced features like facial recognition and intelligent photography.
In summary, while both processors have eight cores and offer powerful performance, the Kirin 985 5G provides notable upgrades in terms of architecture, instruction set, lithography, and neural processing capabilities. These improvements result in improved power efficiency, better overall performance, and support for advanced AI features.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 955, it features a combination of four Cortex-A72 cores, clocked at 2.5 GHz, and four Cortex-A53 cores, clocked at 1.8 GHz. With a total of eight cores, this processor offers a balanced performance for various tasks. It utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 16 nm. The Kirin 955 houses around 2000 million transistors and has a thermal design power (TDP) of 5 Watts.
On the other hand, the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G offers a more advanced architecture and specifications. It incorporates one Cortex-A76 core, clocked at 2.58 GHz, three Cortex-A76 cores, clocked at 2.4 GHz, and four Cortex-A55 cores, clocked at 1.84 GHz. This combination provides a higher level of performance and efficiency. The Kirin 985 5G adopts the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and benefits from a more advanced 7 nm lithography. Additionally, it has a TDP of 6 Watts.
One of the standout features of the Kirin 985 5G is its neural processing capabilities. It features the Ascend D110 Lite and Ascend D100 Tiny neural processing units, which are based on Huawei's Da Vinci Architecture. This allows for enhanced artificial intelligence and machine learning capabilities, providing advanced features like facial recognition and intelligent photography.
In summary, while both processors have eight cores and offer powerful performance, the Kirin 985 5G provides notable upgrades in terms of architecture, instruction set, lithography, and neural processing capabilities. These improvements result in improved power efficiency, better overall performance, and support for advanced AI features.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A72 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
1x 2.58 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 16 nm | 7 nm |
Number of transistors | 2000 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 6 Watt |
Neural Processing | Ascend D110 Lite + Ascend D100 Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 12 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1333 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | UFS 3.0 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T880 MP4 | Mali-G77 MP8 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 700 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 8 |
Shaders | 64 | 128 |
DirectX | 11.2 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 31MP, 2x 13MP | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | 4K@30fp |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 1.4 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 0.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2016 April | 2020 Quarter 2 |
Partnumber | Hi3655 | Hi6290 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 vs HiSilicon Kirin 950
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
4
Unisoc Tiger T610 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
5
Google Tensor G3 vs Unisoc SC9863A
6
MediaTek Helio P60 vs MediaTek Helio G90T
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
8
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
10
Samsung Exynos 2100 vs MediaTek Helio P95