HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
The HiSilicon Kirin 955 and HiSilicon Kirin 970 are two powerful processors, but they do have some differences in their specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 955, it features an architecture of 4x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With a total of 8 cores, it is capable of handling multiple tasks efficiently. The instruction set used is ARMv8-A, which ensures compatibility with a wide range of software. The lithography of this processor is 16 nm, which implies that it is manufactured with a process that allows for higher power efficiency. The Kirin 955 includes 2000 million transistors, allowing for a capable performance. With a TDP of 5 Watts, it is designed to manage power consumption effectively.
On the other hand, the HiSilicon Kirin 970 boasts an upgraded architecture. It is equipped with 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. Again, there are 8 cores in total to handle demanding tasks smoothly. Like the Kirin 955, it uses the ARMv8-A instruction set. However, it features a more advanced lithography of 10 nm, enabling even greater power efficiency. The Kirin 970 takes a significant leap in the number of transistors, with 5500 million, indicating improved performance capabilities. It has a slightly higher TDP of 9 Watts, which is still efficient considering the power it can deliver. One remarkable addition in the Kirin 970 is the inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU). The NPU enhances the processor's capability to handle artificial intelligence-related tasks more efficiently.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 970 outperforms the Kirin 955 in several aspects. It features a more advanced architecture, a smaller lithography, and a higher number of transistors. Additionally, the Kirin 970 incorporates a Neural Processing Unit for improved artificial intelligence capabilities. However, both processors are excellent choices depending on the specific requirements of the system they will be used in.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 955, it features an architecture of 4x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With a total of 8 cores, it is capable of handling multiple tasks efficiently. The instruction set used is ARMv8-A, which ensures compatibility with a wide range of software. The lithography of this processor is 16 nm, which implies that it is manufactured with a process that allows for higher power efficiency. The Kirin 955 includes 2000 million transistors, allowing for a capable performance. With a TDP of 5 Watts, it is designed to manage power consumption effectively.
On the other hand, the HiSilicon Kirin 970 boasts an upgraded architecture. It is equipped with 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. Again, there are 8 cores in total to handle demanding tasks smoothly. Like the Kirin 955, it uses the ARMv8-A instruction set. However, it features a more advanced lithography of 10 nm, enabling even greater power efficiency. The Kirin 970 takes a significant leap in the number of transistors, with 5500 million, indicating improved performance capabilities. It has a slightly higher TDP of 9 Watts, which is still efficient considering the power it can deliver. One remarkable addition in the Kirin 970 is the inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU). The NPU enhances the processor's capability to handle artificial intelligence-related tasks more efficiently.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 970 outperforms the Kirin 955 in several aspects. It features a more advanced architecture, a smaller lithography, and a higher number of transistors. Additionally, the Kirin 970 incorporates a Neural Processing Unit for improved artificial intelligence capabilities. However, both processors are excellent choices depending on the specific requirements of the system they will be used in.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A72 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
Lithography | 16 nm | 10 nm |
Number of transistors | 2000 million | 5500 million |
TDP | 5 Watt | 9 Watt |
Neural Processing | HiSilicon NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4 |
Memory frequency | 1333 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T880 MP4 | Mali-G72 MP12 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 750 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 12 |
Shaders | 64 | 192 |
DirectX | 11.2 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 31MP, 2x 13MP | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 0.15 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2016 April | 2017 September |
Partnumber | Hi3655 | Hi3670 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Flagship |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 vs Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G
2
MediaTek Dimensity 930 vs Unisoc Tiger T310
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
4
Samsung Exynos 9611 vs Apple A17 Pro
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G vs MediaTek Helio G36
8
Google Tensor G1 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
9
HiSilicon Kirin 935 vs MediaTek Helio G37
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs Google Tensor G3