HiSilicon Kirin 950 vs Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G
When comparing the HiSilicon Kirin 950 and the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G processors, there are several key specifications to consider.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 950 features 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G has 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While both processors have 8 cores, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G boasts a slightly higher clock speed on its Cortex-A76 cores.
Moving on to the instruction set, the HiSilicon Kirin 950 utilizes ARMv8-A, while the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G incorporates ARMv8.2-A. This means that the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G supports a newer instruction set, potentially providing improved performance and compatibility with newer software.
In terms of lithography, the HiSilicon Kirin 950 has a 16 nm lithography, while the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G boasts a smaller 6 nm lithography. A smaller lithography generally indicates a more advanced manufacturing process, allowing for greater efficiency and potentially higher performance.
Both processors have a TDP (thermal design power) of 5 Watts, indicating that they consume the same amount of power. However, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G processor also includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which can greatly enhance AI and machine learning capabilities.
Overall, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G appears to have some advantages over the HiSilicon Kirin 950 in terms of architecture, lithography, and the inclusion of an NPU. However, it is important to consider that other factors such as software optimization, overall system design, and real-world performance may also impact the processor's capabilities and user experience.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 950 features 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G has 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While both processors have 8 cores, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G boasts a slightly higher clock speed on its Cortex-A76 cores.
Moving on to the instruction set, the HiSilicon Kirin 950 utilizes ARMv8-A, while the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G incorporates ARMv8.2-A. This means that the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G supports a newer instruction set, potentially providing improved performance and compatibility with newer software.
In terms of lithography, the HiSilicon Kirin 950 has a 16 nm lithography, while the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G boasts a smaller 6 nm lithography. A smaller lithography generally indicates a more advanced manufacturing process, allowing for greater efficiency and potentially higher performance.
Both processors have a TDP (thermal design power) of 5 Watts, indicating that they consume the same amount of power. However, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G processor also includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which can greatly enhance AI and machine learning capabilities.
Overall, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G appears to have some advantages over the HiSilicon Kirin 950 in terms of architecture, lithography, and the inclusion of an NPU. However, it is important to consider that other factors such as software optimization, overall system design, and real-world performance may also impact the processor's capabilities and user experience.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A72 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 16 nm | 6 nm |
Number of transistors | 2000 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 5 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1333 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T880 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP6 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 6 |
Shaders | 64 | 96 |
DirectX | 11.2 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2160x1080 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 31MP, 2x 13MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 2.7 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2015 November | 2021 February |
Partnumber | Hi3650 | T760 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio G35 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
2
MediaTek Helio G35 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
3
MediaTek Dimensity 930 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs Samsung Exynos 9810
5
Samsung Exynos 8895 vs Apple A11 Bionic
6
Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 vs Samsung Exynos 2100
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
9
Samsung Exynos 1330 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G
10
MediaTek Helio P90 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712