HiSilicon Kirin 950 vs Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G
When comparing the HiSilicon Kirin 950 and the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G processors, there are several key specifications to consider.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 950 features 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G has 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While both processors have 8 cores, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G boasts a slightly higher clock speed on its Cortex-A76 cores.
Moving on to the instruction set, the HiSilicon Kirin 950 utilizes ARMv8-A, while the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G incorporates ARMv8.2-A. This means that the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G supports a newer instruction set, potentially providing improved performance and compatibility with newer software.
In terms of lithography, the HiSilicon Kirin 950 has a 16 nm lithography, while the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G boasts a smaller 6 nm lithography. A smaller lithography generally indicates a more advanced manufacturing process, allowing for greater efficiency and potentially higher performance.
Both processors have a TDP (thermal design power) of 5 Watts, indicating that they consume the same amount of power. However, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G processor also includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which can greatly enhance AI and machine learning capabilities.
Overall, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G appears to have some advantages over the HiSilicon Kirin 950 in terms of architecture, lithography, and the inclusion of an NPU. However, it is important to consider that other factors such as software optimization, overall system design, and real-world performance may also impact the processor's capabilities and user experience.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 950 features 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G has 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While both processors have 8 cores, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G boasts a slightly higher clock speed on its Cortex-A76 cores.
Moving on to the instruction set, the HiSilicon Kirin 950 utilizes ARMv8-A, while the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G incorporates ARMv8.2-A. This means that the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G supports a newer instruction set, potentially providing improved performance and compatibility with newer software.
In terms of lithography, the HiSilicon Kirin 950 has a 16 nm lithography, while the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G boasts a smaller 6 nm lithography. A smaller lithography generally indicates a more advanced manufacturing process, allowing for greater efficiency and potentially higher performance.
Both processors have a TDP (thermal design power) of 5 Watts, indicating that they consume the same amount of power. However, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G processor also includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which can greatly enhance AI and machine learning capabilities.
Overall, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G appears to have some advantages over the HiSilicon Kirin 950 in terms of architecture, lithography, and the inclusion of an NPU. However, it is important to consider that other factors such as software optimization, overall system design, and real-world performance may also impact the processor's capabilities and user experience.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A72 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 16 nm | 6 nm |
| Number of transistors | 2000 million | |
| TDP | 5 Watt | 5 Watt |
| Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 16 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1333 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-T880 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP6 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Midgard | Mali Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Execution units | 4 | 6 |
| Shaders | 64 | 96 |
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2160x1080 | |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 31MP, 2x 13MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP |
| Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | FullHD@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 2.7 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2015 November | 2021 February |
| Partnumber | Hi3650 | T760 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
2
MediaTek Helio P95 vs MediaTek Helio G90T
3
HiSilicon Kirin 980 vs MediaTek Helio G36
4
Samsung Exynos 2200 vs MediaTek Helio A22
5
Unisoc SC9832E vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
6
MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
7
MediaTek Dimensity 9400e vs MediaTek Helio G50
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000